Search Results for "symbolic possession"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "symbolic possession"

233 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 233 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Examines Legality of Arrest for Non-Furnishing of Written Grounds Under Article 22(1) and Section 47 BNSS. The Appeal Arises from High Court's Upholding of Arrest Despite Procedural Lapse, with the Supreme Court Considering the Mandatory Nature of the Requirement.

1 Jan 1970

The Supreme Court considered multiple criminal appeals involving the common question of law regarding the mandatory nature of furnishing grounds of ar...

Tribunals

NCLAT Dismisses Appeal Against Liquidation Order in Insolvency Case — Appellant Failed to Show Viable Revival Plan or Error in Impugned Order. Corporate Debtor's Liquidation Upheld as No Resolution Plan Was Received and Appellant's Offer Was Not a Valid Plan Under IBC.

30 Nov -0001

The case involves an appeal filed by P. Naveen Chakravarthy (the appellant) against an order dated 27.01.2021 passed by the Adjudicating Authority (Na...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Bank's Appeal, Holds Borrower of Project Loan Not a Consumer Under Consumer Protection Act, 1986. Loan availed for commercial purpose of film post-production excludes company from consumer definition under Section 2(1)(d)(ii).

28 Feb 2025

The Supreme Court considered two appeals arising from an order of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) dated 30.08.2023. The ap...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Winding Up Petition Against Company for Failure to Repay Convertible Bonds — Debt Admitted and Company Unable to Pay Under Section 433(e) of Companies Act, 1956. The court held that where a debt is admitted and the company is commercially insolvent, a winding up order is justified.

30 Jul 2013

The Bank of New York Mellon, London Branch, as trustee for bondholders, filed a winding up petition under Section 433(e) of the Companies Act, 1956 ag...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Borrowers' Challenge Against DRT Orders Rejecting Interim Relief Despite Pending IBC Section 95 Petition. Interim Moratorium Under Section 96 IBC Bars Continuation of Securitisation Proceedings During Pendency of Insolvency Petition.

21 Apr 2026

The petitioners, M/s. Kapole Advertising Agency and others, were the original borrowers who had approached the Bombay High Court challenging two order...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Interim Injunction in Arbitration Petition Under Section 9 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Restraint Order Set Aside as Arbitrator Already Appointed and No Urgent Relief Required. The court held that a Section 9 petition is not maintainable after the appointment of an arbitrator, as the arbitrator can grant interim measures under Section 17 of the Act.

22 Jun 2006

The appellant, Prakash Boolu Kundar, filed an Appeal from Order against the judgment and order dated November 18, 2005 passed by the Joint District Ju...

High Court

Bombay High Court Declares Payments Made by Company in Liquidation Void Under Section 536(2) of Companies Act, 1956 and Orders Refund. Payments made after winding up order to caterer without court approval are void, and the caterer must repay with interest.

14 Jan 2020

The Official Liquidator of M/s. GOL Offshore Limited (in liquidation) filed OLR No. 139 of 2018 under Section 536(2) of the Companies Act, 1956, seeki...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds DRAT Order Allowing One Time Settlement in Debt Recovery Case — Interest Must Be Calculated as Per OTS Terms. The court held that the DRT erred in not giving effect to the OTS and in calculating interest beyond the OTS terms, and the DRAT correctly set aside the DRT order.

10 Jul 2019

The petitioners, Small Industries Development Bank of India (SIDBI) and India SME Asset Reconstruction Company Ltd., challenged an order dated 26th Ma...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Company Application Seeking Recall of Winding Up Petition Admission Order Against Kingfisher Airlines Limited. Company Court Has No Power to Recall or Review Its Own Order Admitting a Winding Up Petition Under the Companies Act, 1956.

11 Dec 2013

The applicant, Kingfisher Airlines Limited, filed an application under Section 466 of the Companies Act, 1956, seeking recall of the order dated 30.10...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Refers to Larger Bench Whether Investigation by Complainant Police Officer Under NDPS Act Vitiate Trial — Mohan Lal Decision's Applicability Examined. The court considers the conflict between Mohan Lal v. State of Punjab (holding trial vitiated) and Varinder Kumar v. State of Himachal Pradesh (holding prospective application) and refers the matter to a five-judge bench.

31 Aug 2020

This judgment arises from a batch of special leave petitions challenging convictions under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (N...

20 21 22 23 24

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)