Search Results for "superannuation"

1251 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1251 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging School Tribunal's Order on Date of Birth Correction for Pensionary Benefits. Court upholds Tribunal's finding that petitioner's actual date of birth is 15.09.1960 based on school records, rejecting the service book entry of 01.10.1962 as erroneous.

The petitioner, Prakash Narayanrao Thakare, was appointed as an assistant teacher on 17.03.1989 at Sonaji Maharaj High School, Sonala. At the time of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Higher Retirement Age for Assistant Director at Haffkine Institute. Recruitment Rules of Institute Not Binding on State Government; Age of Superannuation Governed by State Government Rules.

The Petitioner, Dr. Nishigandha Ramchandra Naik, was appointed as Assistant Director at the Haffkine Institute for Training Research and Testing, an a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Petition Against MAT Order Allowing Date of Birth Correction. Amendment to Rule 38(2) of Maharashtra Civil Services (General Conditions of Service) Rules, 2008 Lifts Five-Year Bar for Employees Joining Before 16.8.1981.

The State of Maharashtra filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 10.9.2009 passed by ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal for Correction of Date of Birth in Government Service Record — Belated Application and Lack of Evidence Lead to Dismissal. Fundamental Rule 56 Note 6 Requires Correction Within Five Years of Entry into Service.

The appellant, Shri Ramdas Parab, was a government servant who entered service in 1967 as a Watchman. His date of birth was recorded as 10-3-1943 in h...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Industrial Court Order Granting Permanency to Workmen. Employer Failed to Prove Compliance with Section 25-F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, and Workmen Had Completed 240 Days of Service.

The petitioner, Raymond UCO Denim Private Ltd., challenged the order dated 1.1.2009 passed by the Industrial Court, Yavatmal in ULP Complaint No.27 of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal of Employee Seeking Reinstatement Beyond Age 60 — Employee Not Covered Under BIR Act as He Was Not an 'Employee' Under Section 3(13).

The appellant, Shri Vithal Bakula Kokate, was initially appointed as a Learner by Podar Mills in 1966 and later promoted to various positions, ultimat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening of Assessment Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 — No Failure to Disclose Material Facts. Retirement Receipt from Partnership Firm Held Not Taxable as Capital Receipt, Not Revenue Receipt.

The petitioner, Balkrishna Hiralal Wani, was a partner in a firm of solicitors. He retired on 20th October 2003 upon attaining the age of seventy year...