Search Results for "substantive equality"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "substantive equality"

332 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 332 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court of India Examines Constitutionality of Senior Advocate Designation Process Under Section 16 of Advocates Act, 1961. Writ Petitions Challenge Voting Method and Seek Uniform Guidelines for Designation, Including Validity of Supreme Court Rules 2013 and High Court Guidelines.

1 Aug 2026

Judgment Analysis - Auto Generated...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Testimony and Lack of Medical Corroboration. Conviction under Section 4 of POCSO Act and Section 376 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Case Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

1 Jan 2026

The case involves an appeal against the conviction of Dr. Ramesh under Section 4 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 and Sect...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Inclusion in MPSC Merit List Based on Domicile Certificate — Petitioner Failed to Produce Domicile Certificate Before Cut-Off Date, No Right to Claim Inclusion After Deadline

18 Dec 2025

The petitioner, Mr. Sharad Bajirao Patil, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court at Kolhapur seeking a direction to the Maharashtra Public...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Petition in Education and Service Matters — Multiple Petitioners Seek Relief Related to Education and Service Disputes. No specific legal finding extractable as judgment text is limited to the cause title and party list without any substantive content.

21 Dec 2018

...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Hears Writ Petitions Challenging the Constitutionality of Maharashtra Act IX of 2017. Petitioners Contend that Multi-Member Wards and Direct Election of President Violate Article 243R and Equality Clauses.

28 Sep 2018

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Regularisation of Ad-hoc Promotion in Konkan Railway. No Legal Right Established Without Rules or Policy.

6 Dec 2017

The petitioner, Sreekumar G., filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking to quash an order dated 28.06.2013 and to declare that his ad...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Domicile Requirement for Minority Quota Admissions. Clause 18(18) of Information Brochure requiring minority candidates to attach Domicile Certificate for CAP held valid and not violative of Articles 14 and 30 of the Constitution.

24 Jun 2016

The petitioners, Oslen A. Dsilva and another, claiming to be students belonging to minority communities, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Cour...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Termination of Probationary District Judge for Unsatisfactory Performance. Termination under Rule 13(4)(ii)(b) of Maharashtra Judicial Service Rules, 2008 is valid and not stigmatic.

23 Dec 2015

The petitioner, Smt. Smita Rajendra Kadu, was appointed as a District Judge (direct recruitment) under the Maharashtra Judicial Service Rules, 2008. S...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Land Acquisition Notifications Under Act of 2013 for Rural Water Storage Tank — Multiplier of Two Not Applicable. Court holds that Section 26 read with First Schedule of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 does not mandate multiplier of two for rural land acquisition as the land is not in an urban area.

9 Mar 2015

The petitioner, Panjabrao Borade, filed a writ petition challenging notifications dated 19.3.2014 and 13.8.2014 issued by the Deputy Secretary to the ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Hears Consolidated Writ Petitions Challenging the Process of Designation of Senior Advocates Under Section 16 of the Advocates Act, 1961. The Issue Concerns Whether the Existing System of Designation is Arbitrary and Violative of Articles 14, 15, and 21 of the Constitution.

1 Jan 1970

Background: The case concerned a writ petition filed by a Senior Advocate challenging the prevailing system of designation of Senior Advocates in the ...

20 21 22 23 24

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)