Search Results for "sole beneficiary"

370 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 370 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Autonomy of Engineering College and State's Power to Nullify Appointments. Multiple Writ Petitions Challenge Order Terminating 54 Lecturers at College of Engineering, Pune under TEQIP Autonomy.

The case involved three writ petitions before the Bombay High Court concerning the autonomy of the College of Engineering, Pune (CoEP) and the State G...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows U.P. Awas Evam Vikas Parishad's Appeal in Land Acquisition Case — Government's Withdrawal from Acquisition Set Aside Due to Possession and Award. Possession Taken and Award Passed Preclude Withdrawal Under Section 48 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by U.P. Awas Evam Vikas Parishad against the judgment of the Allahabad High Court which had set aside the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Upholds Acquittal in Prevention of Corruption Case Due to Hostile Complainant and Plausible Defence. Foundational Facts of Demand and Acceptance Not Established as Complainant Admitted Receiving Full Entitlement and That Disputed Amount Was His Own Contribution.

This criminal appeal was filed by the State of Maharashtra through the Anti-Corruption Bureau against the acquittal of Anandrao Rajaram Patil, a Secti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses PIL Challenging State's Interpretation of Supreme Court Order Allowing Post-Deadline Transportation. The Petitioner Contends That the Supreme Court's Order Under Article 142 Permitted Only Excavation Till 15 March 2018 and Not Post-Deadline Transportation.

The Goa Foundation, a public interest organization, filed a writ petition in the High Court of Bombay at Goa challenging the State Government's decisi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Public Interest Litigation to Protect Land for Government Sports Complex at Navi Mumbai. CIDCO's commercial allotment of land earmarked for sports complex quashed; State Government's decision to shift complex to remote location set aside.

The Bombay High Court was hearing a Public Interest Litigation filed by the Indian Institute of Architects, Navi Mumbai Center, challenging the action...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Service Matter — Appellant Institution Succeeds in Proving Lack of Employer-Employee Relationship. The respondent failed to establish his employment with the appellant, leading to dismissal of the suit for declaration and injunction.

The appellant, The Chairman The State Government Employees Shikshana Sangha, Laxmi Complex, Neeligin Road, Hubli, represented by its Principal, filed ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Suit Based on Adverse Possession — Overrules Earlier View That Adverse Possession Can Only Be Used as Shield. Plaintiff Who Has Perfected Title by Adverse Possession Can Sue for Declaration and Protection or Recovery of Possession.

The Supreme Court addressed the question whether a person claiming title by adverse possession can maintain a suit for declaration of title and for pr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Title Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Disturbed. Will Execution Not Proved as Attesting Witnesses Not Examined Under Section 68 of Evidence Act, 1872.

The case involves a second appeal filed by the original plaintiffs against the judgment and decree of the lower appellate court in Regular Civil Appea...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Regular First Appeals Against Trial Court Decree Declaring Will Null and Void and Granting Partition. Appellants Challenge Declaration That Will Dated 30.06.1993 Was Executed Under Suspicious Circumstances; Final Judgment Text Incomplete.

The High Court of Karnataka heard two connected regular first appeals under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the judgment and ...