Search Results for "single transaction rule"

1678 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1678 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit for Specific Performance Due to Non-Compliance with Order VI Rule 17 CPC and Lack of Pleading Readiness and Willingness. Plaintiff failed to amend plaint to incorporate essential facts regarding readiness and willingness to perform contract, leading to dismissal of suit.

The plaintiff, Neeta Sawant, filed a suit for specific performance of an Agreement for Sale dated 30th September 2016, by which the defendants agreed ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Impleadment of Subsequent Purchaser in Suit for Specific Performance and Injunction — Applicant Claiming Title Through Subsequent Agreement Must Be Heard Before Final Orders.

The judgment arises from a chamber summons filed by Mugwort Land Holdings Pvt. Ltd. seeking impleadment as a party defendant in Suit No. 2823 of 2006,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Charity Commissioner's Order Allowing Intervention in Trust's Section 36 Application. Right to be Heard Under Maharashtra Public Trust Act, 1951 Limited to Persons with Direct Interest in Trust Property.

The petitioner, Shree Khambhati Modh Vanik Samaj, is a public charitable trust registered under the Maharashtra Public Trust Act, 1950. It owns a prop...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Winding-Up Petitions for Non-Prosecution Due to Non-Compliance with Directions. Failure to File Affidavit of Documents and Appear Before Court Leads to Dismissal Under Rule 34 of the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959.

The judgment concerns two company petitions (CP 496/2014 and CP 497/2014) filed by Janak Herkishen Vaswani and Mrs. Renuka Herkishen Vaswani respectiv...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Share Dispute — No Grounds for Interference Under Section 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Court Held That the Arbitral Tribunal's Findings on Non-Delivery of Shares and Limitation Were Not Perverse or Contrary to Law.

The appellant, M/s Satish K. Narang & Co., an investor, filed an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, against the ju...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010159832015_1

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Cross Revision Applications by Tenant and Landlord in Mesne Profits Dispute. Court Upholds Small Causes Court's Fixation of Mesne Profits and 9% Interest Rate Under Section 34 CPC.

The judgment involves cross civil revision applications filed by the tenant, Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited (BPCL), and the landlord, M/s. Forbe...