Search Results for "semen"

320 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 320 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Unreliable Testimony of Mentally Ill Victim and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 342 and 376 IPC set aside as sole testimony of schizophrenia patient was inconsistent and unsupported by medical or other evidence.

The appellant, Nandlal Zagadu Yadav, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Mumbai in Sessions Case No.77/2008 for offences under Sec...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Death Penalty for Accused in Rape and Murder Case Based on Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Sections 302 and 376 IPC sustained as witness testimonies were trustworthy and chain of circumstances was complete, applying last seen theory and Section 106 Evidence Act.

The Supreme Court of India heard a criminal appeal by an accused convicted under Sections 302 and 376 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, for the rape and...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Rape of Minor Under POCSO Act — Victim's Testimony Found Credible and Age Proved by School Records. The court held that minor contradictions do not discredit the victim's evidence and the presumption under Section 29 POCSO Act applies.

The appellant, Akash s/o Devanand Tempe, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Nagpur in Special Criminal (POCSO) Case No. 198/2016 for the offence pun...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Death Penalty for Three Accused in Kidnap, Gang Rape, and Murder Case — Circumstantial Evidence and DNA Linkage Establish Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The Supreme Court dismissed appeals by three convicts challenging the common judgment of the Delhi High Court which affirmed their conviction and deat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Doubtful Age of Victim. Conviction for Rape and Aggravated Penetrative Sexual Assault Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Victim Was Below 18 Years and Testimony Lacked Corroboration.

The appellant, Praful Maroti Bagde, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Chandrapur, in Special (POCSO) Case No. 92/2018 for offences under...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal of Convict in Rape of Minor Case — Victim's Testimony Found Credible. Conviction under Section 376(2)(i) IPC and Section 6 POCSO Act upheld as medical evidence and prompt FIR corroborate victim's account.

The appellant, Ganesh Laxman Madne, was convicted by the Special Judge and Additional Sessions Judge, Yavatmal, in Special Case No.44/2015 for offence...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Hears Appeal in Criminal Case Involving Conviction Under Sections 376, 392, 452, 506 IPC. Accused-Appellant Challenges Trial Court's Finding of Guilt for Rape of Two Women and Related Offences.

The matter is a criminal appeal arising from the judgment of the District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge, Ahmednagar, in Sessions Case No. 320 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Attempt to Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Allegation of Attempt to Rape Fails as Prosecution Witnesses Contradict Each Other and Medical Evidence Does Not Support the Prosecution Case Under Section 376 read with 511 IPC.

The appellant, Kishor @ Vadya s/o Shivdas Koli, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Bhusawal, in Sessions Case No.100 of 2014 for offences...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in SC/ST Act and Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 376, 363, 506 IPC and Section 3(1)(xii) of SC/ST Act Set Aside as Prosecutrix's Testimony Found Unreliable and Medical Evidence Contradicts Rape Allegation.

The appellant, Ravindra Yogiraj Paul, was convicted by the Special Judge (Atrocity Case) for offences under Sections 376, 363, and 506 of the Indian P...