Search Results for "selection challenge"

1683 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1683 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Dismisses PILs and Writ Petition Challenging Appointment of Vice-Chancellor Under Maharashtra Universities Act, 1994. Court Holds That UGC Regulations 2010 Not Adopted by University, and Search Committee and Chancellor’s Decision Not Vitiated by Illegality or Mala Fides.

The litigation arose out of three petitions—two public interest litigations and one writ petition—challenging the appointment of Dr. Rajan Welukar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows State's Appeal in OAS Recruitment Case — No Right Accrues from Mere Recommendation. Mere recommendation for promotion does not confer a vested right; abolition of cadre and repeal of rules extinguishes any claim.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by the State of Orissa against the judgment of the Orissa High Court which had directed the State to conve...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Direct Recruit District Judge's Claim for Seniority Over Promotees in Kerala Higher Judicial Service. Notional Seniority Granted from Date of Initial Appointment of Other Direct Recruits in Same Selection.

The case involves a dispute over seniority between direct recruit District Judges and promotees appointed by transfer in the Kerala Higher Judicial Se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Retired Professor's Petition for CAS Benefits Due to 24-Year Delay. UGC Revised Norms of 2002 Cannot Be Applied Retrospectively to a Claim Arising Before Their Introduction.

The petitioner, Dr. Venkatrao S/o Bapurao Tak, a retired Associate Professor from Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Agricultural University, filed a writ peti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010366622012_1

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Arbitrary Revision of Seniority of Directors in Indian Postal Service for Violation of Article 16 of Constitution. Selective Promotion Not Based on Seniority and Revision Without Rule Held Discriminatory.

The petitioners, S. K. Ghosh and another, were promoted from Postal Superintendents Service Class II to the time scale of Class I Service in the India...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Validity of Maharashtra Revenue Services (Recruitment) Rules, 2020 and Directs Finalization of Seniority Lists for Deputy Collectors — Seniority to be Determined by Date of Continuous Officiation, Not by Date of Regular Promotion.

The judgment pertains to a batch of writ petitions filed by Deputy Collectors and the State of Maharashtra concerning the determination of seniority o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Whether Service for Time Bound Promotion Should Be Reckoned from Initial Appointment or Regularisation Date. Government Resolution and Supreme Court Precedents on 'Regular Service' Interpreted in Context of TBPS and ACPS.

The case involved a batch of writ petitions filed by the State of Maharashtra under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging orde...