KAHC010102062008_1
10 Aug 2018...
Search Results for "second restoration application"
926 result(s) found
Found 926 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Judicature at Bombay Adjudicated Three Writ Petitions Involving Ownership and Compensation for Land at Village Ulwe. The Petitions Raised Issues Under the Inam Abolition Act, Land Acquisition Act, and the Indian Forest Act Regarding Vesting, Compensation, and Restoration of Possession.
14 Oct 2014The dispute arose from three writ petitions filed before the Bombay High Court concerning land bearing Survey No. 51/0 at village Ulwe, Taluka Panvel,...
- 16
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Upholds Concurrent Findings of Readiness and Willingness. Agreement to Sell for Agricultural Land Partly Performed; Purchaser's Failure to Pay Balance Consideration and Objection to Private Survey Not Valid Grounds to Deny Decree.
16 Aug 2016The respondent (original plaintiff) and his five sisters were co-owners of agricultural land bearing Gat No.122 admeasuring 27 Ares at Village Marnewa...
- 54
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Modifies Compensation Rate in Land Dispute Under Compromise Decree — Guideline Value Under Karnataka Stamp Act, 1957 Fixed at Rs. 750 per Square Foot. Court Holds That Executing Court Erred in Applying Subsequent Notification and High Court's Reduction Was Unwarranted, Directs Payment of Average Guideline Value.
30 Apr 2026The case involves a dispute between Appellants (N.I.C.E.) and the decree holders, Respondents, arising from a compromise decree in a suit for permanen...
- 283
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Quashes Deputy Commissioner's Order in Land Grant Cancellation Case Due to Inordinate 46-Year Delay. The Court held that the exercise of revisional power under Section 136(3) of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 must be within a reasonable time, and the cancellation of revenue entries after more than four decades was unsustainable, particularly when the original grant had never been challenged and revenue entries enjoyed presumptive value under Section 133.
13 Jan 2020The petitioner filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 24.10.2011 passed by the Depu...
- 168
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against Tender Cancellation in Public Procurement Case — State's Decision to Cancel Tender Upheld as Not Arbitrary Under Article 14 of the Constitution.
9 Jul 2024The appeal arose from a High Court order dismissing a writ petition challenging the cancellation of a tender by the State. The appellant, a bidder, co...
- 1076
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Property Suit — Finds Substantial Question of Law on Adverse Possession and Co-owner's Possession. Court holds that possession of one co-owner is possession of all co-owners unless there is ouster, and that the trial court's finding of adverse possession was perverse.
29 Nov 2013The case involves a second appeal filed by the original defendants against the judgment and decree dated 24.07.2012 passed by the learned District Jud...
- 56
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal Against Rejection of Plaint in Partition Suit — Order 7 Rule 11 CPC Not Applicable When Plaint Discloses Cause of Action. Court holds that rejection of plaint under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC is permissible only if the plaint does not disclose a cause of action, and the court cannot go beyond the averments in the plaint.
11 Mar 2022The appellant, Sri Nath M.S., filed a suit for partition and separate possession of suit schedule properties against the respondents, who are his fami...
- 123
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Quashes Orders Under PTCL Act — Petitioner's Title Upheld Despite Non-Grantee Status. Sale deed dated 27.2.1988 in favour of petitioner held valid as Section 4(1) of Karnataka Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prohibition of Transfer of Certain Lands) Act, 1978 does not apply to transfers by non-grantees.
4 Jun 2018The petitioner, Sri S.M. Rajagopal, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka a...
- 61
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Land Title Dispute Against Government — Holds That Government Cannot Unilaterally Resume Land Without Following Due Process and Payment of Compensation. Court Restores Trial Court Decree Declaring Appellants' Title Based on Valid Sale Deed and Pattadar Passbook, Setting Aside High Court's Reversal.
24 Mar 2025The case involves a dispute over 3.34 acres of land in Kurnool District, Andhra Pradesh. The appellants claimed title through a chain of transactions ...
- 375
