Search Results for "revenue mutation"

885 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 885 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Mandamus to Direct Tahsildar to Review Own Mutation Entries. Review Power Not Inherent; Must Be Expressly Provided by Statute.

The petitioner, Dhananjay Deoram Jadhav, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court at Aurangabad seeking a direction to the Tahsildar to revi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Manohar Sahadev Parab, a Talathi, was convicted by the Special Judge, Ichalkaranji, under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Mutation Entry in Revenue Records — Violation of Natural Justice. Failure to Provide Hearing Before Recording Mutation Entry Under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 Renders Entry Invalid.

The petitioners, Vijaya Vijayrao Khadke and Vijay Sheshraoji Khadke, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, challenging mut...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With Under Section 100 CPC. Suit for Declaration of Ownership and Injunction Dismissed as Plaintiff Failed to Prove Title and Possession.

The case involves a second appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, arising from a suit for declaration of ownership and injunct...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Property Partition Suit — Upholds Trial Court's Refusal to Reopen Consent Terms. Consent Terms Recorded in Earlier Suit Are Binding and Cannot Be Reopened Without Proof of Fraud or Collusion Under Order 23 Rule 3 of CPC.

The appellant, Mrs. Geeta Patkar, filed First Appeal No. 18 of 2014 against the judgment and order of the trial court in Special Civil Suit No. 55 of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Land Acquisition for Rehabilitation of Project Affected Persons. Notification under Section 4 and Declaration under Section 6 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 upheld as acquisition was for public purpose of resettlement of displaced persons.

The petitioners, heirs of Ramchandra Desai @ Deshmukh, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the Notificati...