Search Results for "rash and negligent driving"

1372 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1372 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case, Restores Tribunal's Finding on Negligence and Enhances Compensation. Contributory negligence cannot be presumed without evidence; monthly income assessed at Rs.62,725/- based on pay slip.

The present appeals arise from a motor accident claim where the deceased, Boobalan, aged 38, died in a collision with a BMTC bus on 6 June 2016. The d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Truck Driver Convicted for Rash and Negligent Driving Causing Death of a Minor. Concurrent findings of fact on identity of driver and rashness upheld; no interference warranted.

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal of Subhash Chand, who was convicted under Sections 279 (rash driving) and 304-A (causing death by negligence) o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Dismisses MSRTC Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Upholds Tribunal's Compensation Award for Death of Motorcyclist. Negligence of Bus Driver Established as Primary Cause of Accident, Not Contributory Negligence of Deceased.

The appellant, the Controller of Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (MSRTC), filed an appeal against the judgment and award dated 17/01/2012...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Rash Driving Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence. Conviction under Sections 279 and 304A IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The case arises from a criminal revision petition filed by the accused, Puttaiah @ Mahesh, challenging his conviction under Sections 279 and 304A of t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Accused in Illegal Building Collapse Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Evidence of Culpable Homicide and Long Incarceration. Court Held That Section 304 IPC Requires Knowledge of Likely Death, Which Was Not Established Against the Applicants.

The judgment concerns three bail applications filed by accused persons arrested in connection with the collapse of an illegally constructed building i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Insurer Liable to Pay Compensation Despite Driver's Invalid License, with Right to Recover from Owner. Third-party liability upheld under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, applying 'pay and recover' principle.

The case arises from a motor accident claim filed by Babulal Somani and Rukhamanibai, parents of the deceased, who died in a vehicular accident involv...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Reduces Compensation Due to Lack of Proof of Income and Negligence. Owner of Vehicle Held Liable for Contributory Negligence as Driver Was Not Holding Valid Driving Licence.

The case involves multiple appeals arising out of a motor accident that occurred on 18.10.2008. The appellant, New India Assurance Co. Ltd., challenge...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Reduces Compensation Due to Contributory Negligence. Deceased voluntarily pushed stationary truck and came under wheels; court apportions 50% contributory negligence and reduces award from Rs.1,00,000 to Rs.50,000.

The case arises from a motor accident claim filed by the widow and minor children of Madhukar Pundlik Mahalley, who died on 3rd December 1989 when he ...