Search Results for "quash and remand"

428 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 428 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Dismissal Order of Police Officer for Violation of Article 311(2) Safeguards - Dismissal Without Departmental Inquiry Held Illegal as Reasons for Dispensing with Inquiry Were Insufficient and Not Supported by Concrete Evidence.

The appeal arose from the dismissal of a police officer from service without conducting a departmental inquiry, invoking clause (b) of the second prov...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Reserved Category Judicial Officers Challenging High Court Order Quashing Gradation List Based on Roster Points. Seniority for Promotion of Munsiffs Must Be Based on Merit, Not Reservation Roster, as Per Bimlesh Tanwar.

The case involves a dispute over the fixation of seniority of Munsiffs (Batch of 2003) for promotion to the post of Sub-Judge in the State of Jammu & ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Assessment Order in Transfer Pricing Case for Violation of Natural Justice — Failure to Provide Show-Cause Notice and Opportunity of Hearing Renders Order Invalid. Petitioner's Objections to Draft Assessment Order Not Considered, Violating Section 144C of Income Tax Act, 1961.

The petitioner, SHL (India) Private Limited, an Indian company and part of the SHL Group, United Kingdom, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Remands Electricity Theft Case to High Court for Fresh Consideration Under Section 152 of Electricity Act, 2003. Settlement in Lok Adalat does not automatically quash FIR; compounding provisions must be examined.

The appellant, Mukesh Chand, was a consumer of electricity who obtained a connection from BSES Rajdhani Power Limited for his business premises. BSES ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Compulsory Retirement Order Due to Delay and Laches. Petitioner's challenge to a 1986 compulsory retirement order dismissed as the dispute was settled by compromise and the writ petition filed in 2014 was grossly delayed.

The petitioner, S. Rudrappa, a retired cashier of The Mysore Merchants Co-op. Society Ltd., was compulsorily retired on 16.09.1986. He challenged the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Quashing of FIRs in NDPS Act Case Due to Lack of Evidence Against Applicants. No Contraband Recovered from Applicants, No Prima Facie Case Made Out Under Sections 2, 22, 27 of NDPS Act.

The applicants filed a criminal application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, seeking quashing of FIR No.56/2006 registered with...