Search Results for "penalty under Excise Rules"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "penalty under Excise Rules"

430 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 430 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals by Competition Commission of India and Kapoor Glass in Abuse of Dominance Case — No Abuse Found in Volume Discounts and Contractual Terms by Dominant Glass Tubing Manufacturer. The court held that volume discounts are not per se abusive under Section 4 of the Competition Act, 2002, and that the evidence did not establish anti-competitive foreclosure or refusal to supply.

30 Jun 2025

The case arises from an information filed by Kapoor Glass India Pvt. Ltd. on 25 May 2010 under Section 19 of the Competition Act, 2002, alleging that ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Validity of IT Rules Amendment on Fake News in Reference Opinion — Rule 3(1)(b)(v) of IT Rules, 2021 Held Not Violative of Articles 14, 19(1)(a), 19(1)(g) of Constitution and Section 79 of IT Act, 2000.

20 Sep 2024

The present proceedings arise from a reference made under Chapter-I Rule 7 of the Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960 read with Section 98 of...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes LBT Assessment Orders for Violation of Natural Justice and Lack of Jurisdiction. Assessment Orders Passed Without Proper Show Cause Notice and Without Considering Objections Violate Principles of Natural Justice Under Maharashtra Municipal Corporation Act.

10 Aug 2023

The petitioner, Kokuyo Camlin Ltd., filed two writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging two assessment orders dated 13...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Detention of Goods Under GST for Lack of Jurisdiction — Second Detention Without Proper Authorization Invalid. The court held that detention of goods under Section 129 of CGST Act, 2017 requires proper authorization and cannot be done without jurisdiction.

19 Aug 2020

The petitioner, a transporter registered under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (CGST Act) and Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Penalty on Managing Director in FEMA Violation Case — Failure to Complete Import Formalities Constitutes Continuing Offence. Liability under Section 10(6) of FEMA, 1999 attaches to person responsible for conduct of business regardless of change in management.

5 Mar 2020

The appeal arose from complaint proceedings initiated by the Enforcement Directorate under Section 16(3) of the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partly Allows Writ Petition Against Settlement Commission in Anti-Dumping Duty Case; Sets Aside Adjustment of Time-Barred Demand and Imposition of Penalty on Partner. Settlement Commission Cannot Allow Recovery of Duty Beyond Five-Year Limitation Period Under Section 28(4) of Customs Act, 1962, and Penalty on Partner Requires Specific Show Cause Notice.

4 Aug 2017

The petitioner, a partnership firm engaged in importing solvents and chemicals, challenged an order of the Settlement Commission, Customs and Central ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition in Customs Act Case — Confiscation and Penalties Quashed for Lack of Mens Rea. Imported capital goods released on payment of duty; no deliberate intent to evade duty established under Sections 111(d), 111(f), 112(a), and 125 of Customs Act, 1962.

27 Jan 2014

The petitioners, M/s. Central Cables Limited (a company manufacturing electric wires and cables), its Managing Director Govind Daga, and Purchase Offi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of MVAT Provisions on Input Tax Credit Reversal for Capital Goods Sold as Scrap. Section 48(5) of MVAT Act, 2002 and Rule 58A of MVAT Rules, 2005 held intra vires the Constitution and not ultra vires the parent Act.

10 Jun 2013

The judgment concerns a batch of writ petitions filed by various companies challenging the constitutional validity of Section 48(5) of the Maharashtra...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Predeposit Order in Central Excise Valuation Dispute. CESTAT's direction to deposit Rs. 1 crore set aside as assessee had strong prima facie case on valuation under Section 4 of Central Excise Act, 1944.

21 Mar 2012

The appellant, Jabil Circuit India Private Limited, is a manufacturer of set-top boxes. It sold these boxes to Thomson Holdings India Private Limited ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union of India's Petition Challenging Revisional Authority's Order Allowing Rebate to Merchant Exporter. Revisional Authority's finding that merchant exporter cannot be denied rebate for manufacturer's bogus Cenvat credit without evidence of collusion was upheld under Section 35EE of Central Excise Act, 1944.

27 Jun 2011

The Union of India, through the Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai-I, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging an o...

20 21 22 23 24

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)