Search Results for "partner's share"

690 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 690 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Landlord's Eviction Petition in Rent Control Case — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Disturbed. Landlord failed to prove bonafide requirement and unlawful subletting under the Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947.

The petitioners, owners of a property in Thane, filed a suit for eviction of the respondents from a gala (shop) on grounds of default in rent, unlawfu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Winding Up Petition Under the Companies Act, 1956, on Grounds of Loss of Substratum and Insolvency Due to Quashing of 2G Licenses; Final Disposition Not Extracted. Allegations of Dysfunctional Board and Insolvency Form Basis of Just and Equitable Winding Up Claim.

This Company Petition was filed by Etisalat Mauritius Ltd. (Petitioner), a wholly owned subsidiary of Emirates Telecommunications Corporation, seeking...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes NCLT Approval and NCLAT Judgment in Bhushan Power CIRP, Remands for Fresh Resolution Plan. Approved Plan Set Aside Due to Inordinate Delay, Illegal Extension Clause, Waterfall Violation, and Non-Compliance with IBC Provisions Including Sections 30, 31, and 53.

The Supreme Court adjudicated a batch of civil appeals under Section 62 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC) challenging the approval of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Admission of Winding-Up Petition Against Telecom Company Due to Substratum Erosion and Deadlock. Cancellation of 2G Licences and Irreconcilable Differences Between Equal Shareholders Justify Winding-Up Under Section 433(f) of the Companies Act, 1956.

The appeal arose from an order of the company judge admitting a petition for winding up of Etisalat D.B. Telecom Limited (the company) under Section 4...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Revision Against Rejection of Plaint Rejection Application in Property Suit. Held that the plaint discloses a cause of action and is not barred by limitation or res judicata under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC.

The petitioner, Dr. Suresh Bhalchandra Shetye, was the original defendant no.1 in a suit filed by the respondents (original plaintiffs) seeking partit...