Search Results for "negligent act"

2495 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2495 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dharwad Bench Delivers Judgment in Motor Accident Claim Appeal Involving Air Force Sergeant Paralyzed in Road Accident. Tribunal's Dismissal of Claim Based on Lack of Complainant's Complaint and Criminal Charge Sheet Challenged.

The appellant, a former Sergeant in the Indian Air Force, sustained grievous injuries in a road traffic accident on 03.02.2007, resulting in 100% disa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision Petition in Rash Driving Case — Conviction Under Sections 279, 337, 338, 304-A IPC Upheld. Concurrent findings of fact by courts below not interfered with as no perversity or illegality found.

The petitioner, Athaulla, was convicted by the Civil Judge (Jr.Dn.) and JMFC, Gudibande in C.C.No.16/2007 for offences under Sections 279, 337, 338 an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Insurer Liable for Third Party Death. Deceased was a scooterist hit by a luxury bus; insurer failed to prove breach of policy conditions under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The case arises from a motor accident claim where the deceased, Govind Prabhu Patil, was riding a Scooty Pep on 15th November 2012 when a luxury bus (...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal for Enhancement of Compensation in Motor Accident Claim — Negligence of Canter Driver Upheld. Claimants, parents of deceased aged 45, awarded enhanced compensation with 40% future prospects and multiplier of 14 under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The appeal was filed by the claimants, Sri Thimmappa @ Pooja Thimmappa and Smt. Sujathamma @ Pooja Ramanjanappagari Sujathamma, who are the parents of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Pillion Rider Covered Under Section 163-A of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. Held that the expression 'any person' in Section 163-A includes a pillion rider and that the petition is maintainable even in a hit-and-run case.

The appellant, Lalita wd/o Rajkumar Sawalkar, filed a claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, which was later converted to a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Considers Revision Against Summons for Offence Under Section 92 of Factories Act, 1948 for Alleged Violation of Rule 79-A(b) of Karnataka Factories Rules, 1969. Director Argues Lack of Vicarious Liability and Procedural Flaws, but Full Order Not Available.

The revision petition was filed by a director of Hindustan Coca-Cola Beverages Pvt. Ltd., a company engaged in manufacturing beverages, seeking to qua...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Holds That Motor Vehicle Under Repair at Garage is 'Use' for Purposes of Compensation Liability Under Motor Vehicles Act. Court Clarifies That Vehicles Stationed for Repair Fall Within Section 147 Liability, Rejecting Insurer's Narrow Interpretation of 'Use'.

The appeal arose from an order of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Mumbai, awarding compensation of Rs. 8,26,000 with interest to the dependents of...