Search Results for "minor prosecutrix"

392 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 392 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Cancels Bail in POCSO Case Due to Suppression of Material Facts and Failure to Consider Gravity of Offence -- High Court's Bail Order Set Aside as Perverse and Unjustified

The Supreme Court allowed the criminal appeal challenging the High Court's bail order in a case involving serious sexual offences against a minor -- T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Victim Testimony and Lack of Medical Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 376(2)(d)(i)(n), 377, 323 IPC and Section 6 of POCSO Act set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The case involves two criminal appeals filed by Christian Rajendran, Joy Rajendran, and Salomi Rajendran against their conviction and sentence under S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Hears Appeal Against Conviction Under IPC — Conviction Under Sections 363, 366A, 376(2)(f) Challenged

This appeal arises from the conviction of the appellant by the Additional Sessions Judge for offences under Sections 363, 366A and 376(2)(f) of the In...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Conviction Under Indian Penal Code and Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act Upheld – DNA Evidence Confirmed Biological Parentage

Conviction and Sentence Confirmed – Consent Obtained Under Misconception of Fact – Victim Below Eighteen Years of Age (a) Consent of Minor Irrele...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Failure to Prove Age of Victim. Conviction under Section 376 IPC and Section 4 of POCSO Act Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Establish Victim's Age Below 18 Years and Relied on Contradictory Testimony.

The appellant, Asif s/o Jakir Pathan, was convicted by the Special Judge/Additional Sessions Judge, Aurangabad in Special Case (POCSO) No.173 of 2016 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO and Rape Case Due to Unreliable Testimony and Lack of Medical Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 376, 506 IPC and Sections 4, 6 POCSO Act set aside as prosecutrix's evidence was inconsistent and medical evidence did not support sexual assault.

The appellant, Arun Popatrao Pingale, was convicted by the Special Judge, Pune, under Sections 376 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and Sections...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Acquits Accused in Kidnapping Case Under Section 363 IPC Due to Lack of Evidence of Taking. Minor Girl's Voluntary Elopement and Subsequent Marriage Not Constitute Offence of Kidnapping from Lawful Guardianship.

The High Court of Bombay, Nagpur Bench, heard a criminal appeal against the conviction of the accused for kidnapping from lawful guardianship under Se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Kidnapping and Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Proof of Age. Conviction under Sections 363, 366A, and 376 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Establish Victim's Age Below 18 and Consent Was Voluntary.

The appellant, Parvesh Bagde, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Chandrapur, for offences under Sections 363, 366A, and 376 of the Indian...