Search Results for "employer liability"

947 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 947 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Employee's Compensation Case on Interest Calculation Error. Interest Under Section 4A(3)(a) of Employee's Compensation Act, 1923 is Payable from Date of Accident, Not from Commissioner's Order Date, as Compensation Falls Due Immediately on Death.

The appeal arose from a dispute over compensation under the Employee's Compensation Act, 1923, involving the heirs of a deceased sugarcane cutting lab...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Consumer Complaint Against Postal Authorities in Kisan Vikas Patra Fraud Case. Postal authorities not vicariously liable for agent's fraud as payment was made to holder under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, and appellants' negligence in signing instruments contributed to loss.

The dispute arose from a consumer complaint filed by Pradeep Kumar and Raj Rani against postal authorities, including the Post Master General and othe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Assessee's Appeal in MODVAT Credit Deduction Case Under Section 43B of Income Tax Act. Unutilised MODVAT Credit and Sales Tax Recoverable Account Not Allowable as Deduction Without Actual Payment of Excise Duty Liability.

The Supreme Court dismissed appeals by Maruti Suzuki India Ltd. against the Delhi High Court judgment dated 07.12.2017, which upheld the disallowance ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Workmen's Compensation Case — Employer Not Liable for Injury Not Arising Out of Employment. Seaman's Back Injury While Shifting Food Boxes Held Not Covered Under Section 3 of Employees' Compensation Act, 1923 as Injury Did Not Arise Out of and in Course of Employment.

The case involves an appeal by M/s Denklay Marine Services Ltd. and M/s Orinoco Marine Consultancy India Pvt. Ltd. against the judgment and order date...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Bidi Factory Manager Under Factories Act, 1948 Due to Lack of Employer Control Over Workers. Sattedars and Their Coolies Held Not to Be 'Workers' Under Section 2(1) as Factory Management Lacked Control and Supervision Over Manner of Work.

The appellants were the manager of a bidi factory operating under contracts with Sattedars, independent contractors who agreed to supply bidis manufac...