Search Results for "employee"

7032 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 7032 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Pension Benefits to Retired Bank Employee Despite Delay in Deposit of Contribution Amount Under Joint Note Dated 27 April 2010. The court held that the three-day period for deposit was unreasonable and that the petitioner's substantial compliance warranted granting pension.

The petitioner, Ramesh Gajanan Nigudkar, joined the Bank of Baroda as a subordinate staff member on 4 March 1967 and retired after 39 years of unblemi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Reviews Industrial Tribunal's Decision to Reject Approval Application Under Section 33(2)(b) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The Tribunal Found Charges Against Employee Not Proved, Resulting in Reinstatement with 50% Back Wages.

The dispute arose between Tata Memorial Hospital, a trust-run institution, and Shashikant Shrikrishna Sompurkar, who was employed as an Upper Division...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Election Petition Challenging Acceptance of Nomination of Government Servant Candidate. Returning Officer's Decision to Accept Nomination Upheld as Petitioner Failed to Prove Candidate Was Disqualified Under Section 9 of Representation of the People Act, 1951.

The petitioner, Narayan Dinbaji Jambhule, filed an election petition under Section 81 of the Representation of the People Act, 1951, challenging the d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Industrial Court Jurisdiction in Superannuation Dispute. Employee Entitled to Continue Till Age 60 as Per Certified Standing Orders Under Section 28 and Item 9 Schedule IV of MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

The petitioner, Sunflag Iron & Steel Company Limited, challenged the judgment of the Industrial Court, Bhandara, which allowed a complaint filed by th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Directs EPFO to Pay Interest on Delayed Provident Fund Settlement — Paragraph 60(6) of EPF Scheme 1952 Held Not a Bar to Interest Claim. Petitioner entitled to interest from date of retirement till actual payment under Paragraph 72(7) of EPF Scheme 1952.

The petitioner, Mr. M.V. Kanakaraj, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking directions to the Regional C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Bank's Petition Against Labour Court Orders Granting Reinstatement with Back Wages to Employee -- Upholds Violation of Natural Justice in Departmental Inquiry Under Industrial Disputes Act

The petitioner Bank challenged orders of the Labour Court and Industrial Court that declared a departmental inquiry against the respondent employee il...