Search Results for "controlling interest"

551 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 551 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Challenging Sanction and Cognizance in UAPA Case — No Infirmity Found in Sanction Order or Cognizance Order. Court upholds validity of suo-motu sanction under Section 45(2) of UAPA and cognizance order under Section 120B IPC read with UAPA and CLA Act.

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal filed by Fuleshwar Gope challenging the judgment of the Jharkhand High Court which refused to quash the sanctio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Steel Plant Operation Under Pollution Board Supervision Pending Environmental Clearance Compliance. The Court held that the High Court erred in discontinuing interim orders allowing operation under Board supervision, balancing environmental protection with livelihood concerns.

The case involves Electrosteel Steels Limited, which owns a 1.5 MTPA integrated steel plant in Bokaro, Jharkhand, employing 3,000 regular and 7,000 co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Stamp Duty Demand on Development Agreement — Karnataka Appellate Tribunal's Order Set Aside for Lack of Proper Consideration of Evidence and Non-Application of Mind to the Definition of 'Conveyance' Under the Karnataka Stamp Act, 1957.

The petitioners, M/s. Motwani Builders and M/s. B. Alim Builders, filed writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Tender Award for Water Supply Scheme. Court sets aside award to Respondent No.5 and directs fresh evaluation of petitioner's bid as per tender conditions.

The petitioner, Jain Irrigation Systems Limited, a company incorporated under the Companies Act and engaged in manufacturing plastic pipes and executi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows PIL Against APMC for Illegal Construction Without Development Permission Under MRTP Act. Agricultural Produce Marketing Committee Not a Local Authority Under Section 2(15) of MRTP Act, Hence Not Exempt from Section 44.

This Public Interest Litigation was filed by Goroba Pandurang Gadekar against the State of Maharashtra, Latur Municipal Corporation, Agricultural Prod...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Stamp Duty Demand Against Successors in Interest Due to Violation of Natural Justice. Predecessor in title not given opportunity of hearing before determination of deficit stamp duty under Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958.

The petitioners, who are the legal heirs and successors in interest of one Abubakar Memon, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution...