High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Appeals Filed Against Single Judge Order in Land Acquisition Matters Involving KIADB. Appeals Challenge Order Dated 04.07.2025 in Various Writ Petitions Filed by Landowners and Developers.
29 Jul 2026...
Search Results for "authorized bank"
1723 result(s) found
Found 1723 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging FEMA Show Cause Notices Against BCCI President. Section 42 of FEMA applies to persons in charge of and responsible for the conduct of business of a company, and the petitioner as President is covered.
7 Aug 2013The petitioner, Shashank Vyankatesh Manohar, was the President of the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) from 2008 to 2011. During this peri...
- 115
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Sanction for Prosecution Under Prevention of Corruption Act — Sanction Order Not Required to Be a Speaking Order. Court held that the sanction order under Section 19 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 need not contain detailed reasons and can be based on material placed before the sanctioning authority.
12 Jul 2018The petitioner, Nandlal Chaturvedi, filed a criminal writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 29th Jan...
- 121
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Judicial Immunity and IBC Proceedings as Abuse of Process. Challenge to Section 3 of Judges (Protection) Act, 1985 and Section 7 of IBC held to be frivolous and not maintainable.
20 Dec 2024The petitioner, Mrs. Manisha Nimesh Mehta, as promoter and guarantor of M/s. Perfect Infraengineers Ltd., filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Cou...
- 287
High Court
Bombay High Court Considers Winding Up Petition Under the Companies Act, 1956, on Grounds of Loss of Substratum and Insolvency Due to Quashing of 2G Licenses; Final Disposition Not Extracted. Allegations of Dysfunctional Board and Insolvency Form Basis of Just and Equitable Winding Up Claim.
20 Feb 2015This Company Petition was filed by Etisalat Mauritius Ltd. (Petitioner), a wholly owned subsidiary of Emirates Telecommunications Corporation, seeking...
- 16
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Partition Suit by Second Wife Against Stepchildren — Agreement of 1989 Bars Claim to Deceased Husband's Properties. Court Holds That Plaintiff Voluntarily Relinquished Rights to Movable and Immovable Properties of Sureshchandra Jhaveri by Agreement Dated 03.05.1989, Which Was Not Vitiated by Coercion or Misrepresentation, and That Properties in Exhibit-A Were Not Self-Acquired Properties of Deceased.
10 Jun 2024The Plaintiff, the second wife of Sureshchandra Jhaveri, filed a suit seeking a declaration of her one-fourth share in the suit properties described i...
- 263
High Court
Bombay High Court Hears Interim Application in Suit for Cancellation of Lease Modification Deeds. Application Seeks Injunction Against Construction and Alienation of Cooperative Society Property.
14 Jan 2026The matter involved a cooperative housing society and its lessee/assignee concerning a perpetual lease on a portion of land. The plaintiff, Usha Sunde...
- 16
High Court
High Court of Judicature at Bombay Considers Arbitration Petition No. 1070 of 2011 Under Section 45 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The Petition Seeks Reference to ICC Arbitration in Dubai Pursuant to a Share Purchase Agreement; the Judgment Text is Incomplete.
20 Dec 2012The matter arose from a Share Purchase Agreement (SPA) dated 10 December 2004 between Welspun Trading Limited (transferor) and Eupec PipeCoatings GmbH...
- 11
High Court
- 67
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Letters Patent Appeal in Cooperative Society Dispute — Upholds Order Under Section 88(1) of MCS Act for Recovery of Damages from Delinquent Promoters. The court affirmed the power of the Registrar to assess damages under Section 88(1) of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960, and found no ground to interfere with the concurrent findings.
17 Oct 2025The appellant, Ramdas Yashwant Mandlik (deceased) through his legal heirs, filed a Letters Patent Appeal against the judgment and order dated 28 July ...
- 83
