Search Results for "assistant controller"

341 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 341 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION NOs. 4198 2005, 564 2009, 804 2002,

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Deficit Stamp Duty Demand — Limitation Period Under Section 32-A(1) of Bombay Stamp Act, 1958 Is Mandatory. Demand for deficit stamp duty and penalty made after 5 years from execution of instrument is without jurisdiction and liable to be quashed.

The petitioner, Meena Shyam Tulsani, purchased a commercial office premises admeasuring 351 sq.ft super built up area in 1999 through a notarized agre...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Scrutiny Committee Order Invalidating Scheduled Tribe Certificate for Failure to Consider Documents and Affinity Test. Raj Community Recognized as Scheduled Tribe Under Constitution (Scheduled Tribes) Order, 1950.

The petitioner, Manohar Balkrishna Pinjarkar, challenged the decision of the Committee for Scrutiny and Verification of Tribe Claims, Amravati, dated ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010422252008_1

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

CUSTOMS APPEAL NO. 100 OF 2012

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Sets Aside Patent Opposition Dismissal for Lack of Reasoning and Non-Application of Mind. The court quashed the Deputy Controller's order as it failed to provide reasons and assess prior art under Section 25(2)(c) of the Patents Act, 1970, violating principles of natural justice.

The dispute arose from a post-grant opposition filed by the petitioner under Section 25(2)(c) of the Patents Act, 1970, challenging Patent No. IN 2830...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Against IPAB Order for Violation of Natural Justice in Patent Pre-Grant Opposition. Pre-grant opponent not heard before allowing patent appeal, order set aside and matter remanded.

The petitioner, Dhaval Diyora, filed a pre-grant opposition under Section 25(1) of the Patents Act, 1970 against the patent application of Respondent ...