Search Results for "arbitration mandate"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "arbitration mandate"

650 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 650 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows MCGM's Appeal Against Arbitrator's Dismissal of Counter Claim at Threshold - Limitation for Counter Claim in Arbitration. The court held that the Arbitrator erred in dismissing the counter claim on limitation without a full trial, as the counter claim related to the same contract and was filed before conclusion of proceedings.

21 Jan 2020

The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM) appealed against an order of a sole Arbitrator dated 23rd June 2009 dismissing its Counter Claim at...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Order Condoning Delay of 129 Days in Arbitration Petition. Benefit of Section 14 of Limitation Act Extended as Earlier Filing in Delhi Court Was Bona Fide Despite Lack of Territorial Jurisdiction.

25 Jan 2017

The dispute arose from an arbitral award passed on 25 February 2014. The respondent, Globe Capital Market Ltd., challenged the award by filing an arbi...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Arbitration Petition in Interest on Security Deposit Dispute. Contractual Bar on Interest and Non-Applicability of Section 31(7)(a) Arbitration Act Renders Claim Unsustainable; Arbitrator’s Finding on Evidence Upheld.

11 Aug 2014

The dispute arose from an agreement dated 30 December 1996 between the petitioner, M/s. Mascon Multiservices & Consultants Pvt. Ltd., and the responde...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Director’s Challenge to Arbitral Award in Factoring Facility Dispute — Upholds Award Despite Claims of Forged Guarantee and Procedural Lapses. Arbitral Tribunal’s Award Allowing SBI Global Factors’ Claim of Rs.43.45 Crores Jointly and Severally Against Guarantor and Principal Debtor Not Found Patent Illegality Under Section 34.

23 Dec 2025

This judgment relates to a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 filed by Sanjeev Malhotra, a former director and sh...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Chamber Summons to Set Aside Abatement of Arbitration Petition and Condonation of Delay. Application Filed Under Order 22 Rule 9 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 to Bring Legal Representatives of Deceased Parties on Record.

15 Feb 2013

The Chamber Summons was filed under Order 22 Rule 9 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, seeking to set aside the abatement of Arbitration Petition N...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition to Set Aside Termination of Arbitral Proceedings and Constitute New Arbitral Tribunal Under Sections 9 and 14 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Delay Condoned Due to Sufficient Cause Shown by Legal Heirs of Deceased Partner.

12 Aug 2015

The petitioners, Neeta Lalit Sanghavi and Hemanshu Lalit Sanghavi, are the legal heirs of the deceased partner, Lalitkumar Vanmalidas Sanghavi. They f...

High Court

High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Majority Arbitral Award in Maritime Demurrage Dispute — Claim Time-Barred Under Charterparty Clause 24. The court upheld the majority arbitrators' finding that the demurrage claim was received beyond the 45-day period stipulated in clause 24 of the Tanker Voyage Charterparty, and thus the claim was time-barred.

4 Jan 2012

The petitioner, Axios Navigation Co. Ltd., a shipowner, challenged a majority arbitral award dated 18 August 2008 passed by a three-member Arbitral Tr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals in PFA Supply Dispute, Upholds Arbitral Award. Findings of fact by arbitral tribunal are not open to reappraisal in appeal under Section 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 unless perverse or contrary to public policy.

19 Mar 2013

The case arises from an agreement dated 4 October 2000 between Maharashtra State Electricity Board (MSEB) and Dirk India Private Limited (DIPL) for th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Section 11 Applications for Appointment of Arbitrator in Partnership Disputes Involving Legal Heirs of Deceased Partner. The Court held that the arbitration clause in the partnership deed is binding on the legal representatives of the deceased partner, and the applicants being daughters and legal heirs are entitled to invoke arbitration.

6 Jun 2022

The judgment concerns four applications filed under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, by Priya Rishi Bhuta and another, who ar...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Contractor's Appeal in Arbitration Act Case — Restoration of Majority Award on Escalation Clause Interpretation. Section 30 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 Not Attracted as Arbitral Interpretation of Contract Clause Was Plausible.

5 Apr 2006

The appeal arose from an order of a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court setting aside a majority arbitral award under Section 30 of the Arbi...

20 21 22 23 24

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)