High Court of Karnataka Writ Petition (PIL) – Cause Title Only. No substantive judgment text provided.
21 Jun 2016...
Search Results for "Tahsildar enquiry"
765 result(s) found
Found 765 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Maintainability Challenge and Upholds RERA Recovery Certificate in Allottee Refund Case. Real Estate Regulatory Authority Has Power to Issue Recovery Certificate Under Section 40(1) of RERA Act, 2016 for Refund Orders.
9 Mar 2020The judgment pertains to two connected matters: an Interim Application filed by the developer, Marvel Sigma Homes Pvt. Ltd., challenging the maintaina...
- 105
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Land Acquisition Compensation Claim as Time-Barred Due to 37-Year Delay. Challenge to Award Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Rejected for Unexplained Laches.
27 Sep 2016The petitioners, Babasaheb Eknath Wakchaure, Sunil Namdeo Wakchaure, and Balasaheb Gangadhar Wakchaure, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court...
- 89
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Caste Scrutiny Committee Order Invalidating Scheduled Tribe Certificate. Court upholds committee's finding that petitioners failed to prove they belong to 'Koli' Scheduled Tribe, emphasizing that mere possession of a caste certificate does not confer validity without proper scrutiny.
15 Dec 2006The petitioners, Sagiruddin Israiluddin Mistry and Mrs. Shaheen Ara Salim Baig, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 10th June 2005 passed...
- 291
High Court
Karnataka High Court Allows Appeal in Land Reforms Act Case — Tenancy Rights Not Established Due to Lack of Evidence of Cultivation. Land Tribunal's Order Based on Surrender Deemed Invalid as Surrender by Non-Tenant Has No Legal Effect Under Section 48-A of Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961.
17 Nov 2022The present appeal arises from a judgment of the learned Single Judge dismissing the writ petition filed by the appellants challenging the order of th...
- 254
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Dispute — Plaintiff Fails to Prove Daughter Status and Will Invalidity. The court upheld the concurrent findings that the appellant did not establish her filiation to the deceased tenant Bala and that the respondents proved their title under a valid will.
7 Dec 2018The appellant, Mainabai, filed a suit for declaration that she was the daughter of Bala, that a certificate under Section 38(E) of the Hyderabad Tenan...
- 84
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Civil Court Decree in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With Under Article 227. The court held that the concurrent findings of fact recorded by the trial court and the first appellate court in a suit for partition and separate possession were based on proper appreciation of evidence and did not warrant interference under Article 227 of the Constitution of India.
30 Nov -0001The petitioners, Divakar Savleram Torne, Dinkar Savleram Torne, and Pramod Dinkar Torne, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution o...
- 53
High Court
Karnataka High Court Dismisses Writ Appeal in Land Reforms Act Matter — Upholds Land Tribunal's Order Granting Occupancy Rights. The Court held that the Land Tribunal's findings of fact regarding cultivation and tenancy are final and not subject to interference under writ jurisdiction unless perverse or based on no evidence.
28 May 2025The case pertains to a dispute over occupancy rights in agricultural land under the Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961. The appellants, who are legal re...
- 29
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Caste Certificate Validity in Homeopathic Admission Dispute. Court Directs Scrutiny Committee to Follow Natural Justice and Permits Students to Continue Studies Pending Verification.
30 Nov -0001The petitioners, two sisters Anita and Jyotsna Himgire, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the action of the Scheduled Cas...
- 88
High Court
Bombay High Court Hears Writ Petition Against Appellate Reversal of No Confidence Motion Against Sarpanch under Bombay Village Panchayat Act, 1958. The Petition Raises Issue of Non-Service of No Confidence Motion Notice on Sarpanch Despite Participation in Meeting.
23 Aug 2012The writ petition arose from a dispute over the validity of a no-confidence motion passed against the Sarpanch of Varkhedi Gram Panchayat under the Bo...
