Search Results for "Special Land Acquisition Officer"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Special Land Acquisition Officer"

2034 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2034 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka, Kalaburagi Bench Adjudicates Multiple Land Acquisition Appeals and Cross Objections Filed by Acquiring Body and Landowners Against Reference Court Award. Enhancement of Compensation from Rs.63,363/- to Rs.39,20,400/- per Acre is Challenged by Railways While Landowners Seek Further Enhancement.

24 Sep 2020

The judgment (as reported) is incomplete and lacks a final determination. It pertains to a batch of miscellaneous first appeals and cross objections f...

High Court

KAHC010448052021_1

7 Feb 2025

These Miscellaneous First Appeals were filed by the Assistant Executive Engineer of Visvesvaraya Jala Nigam Limited, the acquiring body, challenging t...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Municipal Corporation's Land Acquisition for Road Construction Under Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act. Municipal Corporation Validly Exercised Independent Powers Under MMC Act Without Requiring Road Inclusion in Development Plan Under MRTP Act, With Public Interest Justifying Acquisition Despite Property Owners' Objections.

2 Sep 2022

The dispute originated from the Municipal Corporation of Mumbai's efforts to acquire portions of the appellants' property for constructing a link road...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal in Land Acquisition Case — Appellants Failed to Prove Title and Possession. Land Acquisition Under KIAD Act Upheld as Appellants Were Not Owners and Compensation Was Already Paid to Recorded Owner.

17 Aug 2020

The appellants, Sri K. Srinivas Murthy and Smt S.V. Padma, filed a writ appeal against the order of a Single Judge dismissing their writ petition chal...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Partly Allows Second Appeal in Land Acquisition, Enhances Compensation to Rs.3,00,000/- Per Acre Based on 10% Escalation. Interest Under Section 34 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Held Payable Only From Date of Award, Following Supreme Court Precedent in Karigowda.

17 Feb 2016

The case arose from the acquisition of agricultural lands in Mugabasava village, Bailhongal taluk, Belgaum District, for the Malaprabha Reservoir Proj...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Declaration of Withdrawal from Land Acquisition for Gavipuram Extension Layout. Court Holds That Section 48(1) Notification Not Gazetted Is Ineffective and Acquisition Completed in 1987 Bars Withdrawal.

21 Jul 2025

The petitioners, legal representatives of original grantees of 2 acres and 20 guntas of land in Sy. No. 26 of Nagadevanahalli Village, Bangalore, soug...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Market Value of Agricultural Land Fixed at Rs. 50,000 per Acre. Compensation for Fruit Trees Reduced Due to Lack of Evidence of Actual Number and Age.

18 Jan 2018

The case involves two cross-appeals arising from land acquisition proceedings for the Upper Manjra Medium Project. The claimant, Annasaheb Sambhajirao...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Land Acquisition for Road Widening Project — Petitioners Failed to Demonstrate Violation of Statutory Provisions or Fundamental Rights. The court held that the acquisition was for a public purpose and that the petitioners' remedy lay in seeking enhancement of compensation under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, rather than challenging the acquisition itself.

7 Jul 2023

The petitioners, owners of land in Village Wagholi, Pune, challenged the acquisition of their land for a road widening project by the State of Maharas...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Challenge to Land Designation for Timber Industry Under Maharashtra Regional Town Planning Act, 1966. Petitioners, Landowners, Served Purchase Notices and Contended That No Acquisition Steps Were Taken Within Six Months, While Pune Municipal Corporation Asserted Proposal Was Submitted Before Notices.

29 Apr 2005

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Lapsing of Land Reservation Under Section 127 of MRTP Act for Non-Acquisition Within Ten Years. The court held that failure to acquire reserved land within the statutory period results in automatic lapsing of reservation and release of land to the owner.

17 Feb 2017

The petitioner, Siddharam Shivappa Patil, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court seeking a ...

20 21 22 23 24

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)