Search Results for "Section 34(1)"

1008 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1008 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Quashing of FIR in Extortion Case After Compromise Between Accused and Informant. Offence of Extortion Not Made Out as No Money Changed Hands, and Other Offences Were Compoundable.

The applicants filed a criminal application under Section 482 CrPC seeking quashing of FIR No. 214/2019 registered at Police Station Nagpuri Gate, Amr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Caste Scrutiny Committee Order Cancelling Scheduled Caste Certificate Due to Violation of Natural Justice. Committee Failed to Provide Documents and Opportunity to Cross-Examine Complainant, Rendering Proceedings Void Under Maharashtra Act No. XXIII of 2001.

The petitioner, Bhanudas Hona Gajbhiv, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an order of the Scheduled Cast...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Sets Aside Enhancement of Sentence in POCSO Case Due to Procedural Violation — High Court's Suo Motu Enhancement Without Notice Held Illegal. Enhancement of Sentence from 7 to 10 Years in Accused's Own Appeal Violates Section 386 Proviso CrPC and Principles of Natural Justice.

The appellant, Kumar Ghimirey, was convicted by the Special Judge (POCSO Act, 2012) under Section 9/10 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Compensation Award in Motor Accident Case — Insurance Company Liable for Negligent Parking of Vehicle. Truck parked without indication on highway causing accident; insurer held jointly liable with owner for compensation under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The case arises from a motor accident that occurred on 13th March 2009, when the respondent no.1, a minor aged 10 years, was traveling in a Tata Magic...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Quashing of POCSO and IPC Proceedings on Compromise Between Accused and Complainant Who Later Married. Marriage Between Accused and Complainant Leads to Quashing of FIR Under Section 482 CrPC as Continuation Would Be Abuse of Process.

The applicants, Taj @ Arjun S/o. Ajay Mishra (accused) and Ragini Ashok Amarnani (complainant), jointly filed a criminal application under Section 482...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Whether Denial of Admission to Medical College Under SC Quota to Son of Resident Government Servant on Ground of Parental Migration Violates Rights. Issue Pertains to Interpretation of UT Reservation Policy Clause on Migration.

The petitioners, a father and son, approached the High Court of Bombay under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by way of a writ petition challe...