Search Results for "Section 16(2) notification"

493 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 493 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Default Bail Appeals in UAPA Case — Extension of Investigation Time Valid Despite Procedural Irregularities. Supreme Court Had Restored Extension Order, Charge-Sheet Filed Within Extended Period, Hence No Indefeasible Right to Default Bail Under Section 167(2) CrPC.

The case involves two criminal appeals challenging a common order dated 28th June 2022 passed by the learned Special Judge, NIA, Greater Mumbai, rejec...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Adjudicates Multiple Appeals and Cross-Objections Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Challenging Enhanced Compensation for Railway Project Lands. Market Value Determination at Rs.39,20,400 per Acre by Reference Courts Contested as Inadequate by Landowners and Excessive by Railways.

These appeals and cross-objections arose from land acquisition proceedings initiated by the State for the South Central Railway in Mahagaon village, K...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal by Bangalore Development Authority Against Order to Compensate Land Owner for Unauthorized Use. Court Rules That Taking Private Property Without Acquisition Proceedings Violates Constitutional Right Under Article 300-A.

The case involved a dispute over private land owned by P.G. Belliappa, which was taken over by the Bangalore Development Authority (BDA) without any a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Considers Validity of Designation of Senior Advocates Without Framed Rules Under Advocates Act, 1961. Petitioners Seek to Quash Notifications and Require High Court to Frame Rules for Designation of Senior Advocates.

These writ petitions were filed in public interest by two advocates practicing in the High Court of Karnataka, challenging notifications dated 30.06.2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Upholds Enhanced Compensation for Acquired Orchard Land in Road Project. Compensation increased from Rs.25 to Rs.100 per square metre based on comparable sales and development potential under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The case involves two first appeals and cross objections arising from the acquisition of land for the improvement and black topping of a road at Cotom...