Search Results for "Section 140 Contract Act"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "Section 140 Contract Act"

282 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 282 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal Against KSFC Order in Guarantor Liability Case — Limitation Period for Filing Application Under Section 31(1)(aa) of SFC Act Is Three Years from Date of Cause of Action. Guarantor's Defence of Limitation Upheld as Petition Filed Beyond Three Years from NPA Classification.

15 Apr 2025

The appellant, Smt. C. Sarasamma, was a guarantor for a loan availed by respondent No.2, M/s. Ethnic Informatics Private Ltd., from respondent No.1, K...

High Court

Madras High Court Upholds Government Permission for Ford India Plant Closure, Dismisses Workers' Challenge. Closure Permission Under Section 25-O of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Valid as Government Considered All Relevant Factors and Provided Compensation.

24 Jan 2025

The case involves a batch of writ petitions filed by 59 workers of Ford India Private Limited challenging the Government Order G.O.Ms.No.171 dated 28....

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal by Suspended Director in IBC Section 7 Admission Case — Balance Sheet Entries Constitute Valid Acknowledgement of Debt Under Section 18 of Limitation Act, 1963. The Court held that entries in the balance sheet of a corporate debtor, even without naming the specific creditor, amount to an acknowledgement of debt extending limitation under Section 18 of the Limitation Act, 1963, read with Section 238A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.

18 Oct 2024

The appeal arose from the admission of a Section 7 application under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC) by the National Company Law Tribun...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals in Motor Accident Claims, Holds Insurance Company Liable Despite Breach of Policy Conditions. The court directed pay and recover from the owner for violation of permit conditions, relying on Section 149 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

8 Mar 2024

The case arises from a motor accident that occurred on an unspecified date, involving a vehicle owned by Shrihari s/o Kalyanrao Parkale (respondent No...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Refers Review Petitions on Women's Entry to Sabarimala Temple to Larger Bench — Constitutional Questions on Religious Freedom and Essential Practices Require Authoritative Determination by Seven-Judge Bench. The court identified an apparent conflict between Shirur Mutt and Durgah Committee regarding judicial review of essential religious practices under Articles 25 and 26 of the Constitution.

14 Nov 2019

The Supreme Court, in a judgment dated November 14, 2019, disposed of a batch of review petitions and connected matters arising from the earlier judgm...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal in Income Tax Reassessment Case — No Substantial Question of Law Arises. Reassessment notice under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 upheld as validly issued within four years from end of assessment year.

31 Jul 2019

The appellant, M/s. Kanhaiyalal Dudheria, a partnership firm, filed appeals under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against the orders of the ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partly Allows Appeal by Kadamba Transport Corporation in Motor Accident Claim — Reduces Compensation for Amputation of Thumb. Claimant's Income Assessed at Rs. 3,000 per Month Instead of Rs. 5,000, Multiplier Reduced from 16 to 11 Based on Age.

12 Oct 2010

The case arises from a motor accident claim filed by Santosh Anant Naik (respondent no.1/claimant) against Kadamba Transport Corporation Ltd. (appella...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Recovery Suit Against Customs for Wrongful Sale of Goods Held by Court Receiver. Plaintiff entitled to refund of purchase price paid to Court Receiver for goods that could not be delivered due to prior sale by Customs.

28 Sep 2010

The suit was filed by M & H Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. (Plaintiff) against the Court Receiver, High Court, Bombay (Defendant No.1) and the Commissioner of ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Directs Return of Security Deposit with Interest in Customs Duty Dispute — Petitioner Entitled to Refund of Rs.10 Crores with 18% Interest After CESTAT Set Aside Confiscation Order. The Court held that once proceedings are finalized in favour of the importer, the revenue cannot retain the security deposit and must return it with interest from the date of deposit under the Customs Act, 1962.

14 Jun 2010

The petitioner, M/s Pride Foramer, a company engaged in offshore oil exploration, imported a rig 'Pride Pensylvania' for a contract with ONGC. On 15 M...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Suit for Declaration of Title and Injunction — Finds Trial Court Erred in Holding That Plaintiffs Failed to Prove Title and Possession Over Suit Property. The Court Held That the Plaintiffs' Possession Was Established Through Evidence of Cultivation and Payment of Land Revenue, and the Defendants Failed to Prove Their Title.

24 Aug 2005

The appellants, original plaintiffs, filed a suit for declaration of title and permanent injunction in respect of a property situated in Calangute, Go...

20 21 22 23 24

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)