INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.626 OF 2010
12 Aug 2010The assessee, Godrej & Boyce Mfg. Co. Ltd., filed its income tax return for Assessment Year 2002-03 declaring a loss of Rs. 45.90 crores and claimed a...
Search Results for "Section 112 Indian Evidence Act"
901 result(s) found
Found 901 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Strikes Down Caste-Based Discrimination in Prison Manuals as Unconstitutional. Prison Rules Dividing Labour and Segregating Barracks by Caste Violate Articles 14, 15, 17, 21, and 23 of the Constitution.
1 Oct 2024The petitioner, Sukanya Shantha, a journalist, filed a writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution seeking directions for the repeal of offendi...
- 376
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Partially Strikes Down FCRA Amendment Act 2020 — Ban on Transfer of Foreign Funds and Mandatory Aadhaar Held Unconstitutional. The court upheld the requirement of a single FCRA account at SBI New Delhi as a reasonable regulatory measure to prevent misuse of foreign funds.
1 Jan 2021The judgment deals with a batch of writ petitions challenging the constitutional validity of certain amendments made to the Foreign Contribution (Regu...
- 525
High Court
High Court of Bombay Considers Appeal Against Rejection of Bail in Malegaon Bomb Blast Case. Accused Charged Under Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act and Other Serious Offences Seeks Release Pending Trial.
25 Apr 2017The appeal arose from the rejection of a bail application by the Special Court under the Maharashtra Control of Organized Crime Act, 1999 and the Nati...
- 47
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Promoter's Appeal in Real Estate Regulation Case, Upholding Authority's Jurisdiction and Pre-deposit Condition. The court affirmed that a single member of the Real Estate Regulatory Authority has jurisdiction to order refunds under Section 18 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act 2016, and the pre-deposit requirement under Section 43(5) is valid for statutory appeals.
11 Nov 2021The dispute arose from appeals filed by promoters and real estate developers against orders of the High Court of Allahabad, which had dismissed their ...
- 230
High Court
High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, Hears Challenge to Disqualification Show Cause Notices Under Maharashtra Municipal Council Act. The court examined allegations of natural justice violation and constitutional autonomy of local bodies, but final decision is not available in the provided excerpt.
31 Oct 2018The petitioners, nine municipal councillors and the vice president of Beed Municipal Council, filed a writ petition before the Aurangabad Bench of the...
- 75
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Considers Challenge to Leave India Notice by Australian Employee over Alleged Violation of Natural Justice and FRRO's Jurisdiction. Employment Visa Grant by High Commission Not Subject to FRRO's Nullification, Argues Petitioner.
9 Feb 2026The writ petition was filed by an Australian citizen, who held an Employment Visa (E-2) valid from 08.01.2018 to 07.01.2020, after being appointed as ...
- 106
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging FEMA Adjudication Orders for Lack of Jurisdiction and Limitation. Petitioners' challenge to show cause notices and adjudication orders under FEMA fails as writ petitions are not maintainable against mere show cause notices and are barred by delay and laches.
19 Nov 2022The judgment pertains to two writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging show cause notices and adjudication order...
- 58
High Court
Bombay High Court Disposes of News Broadcaster's Petition Challenging RBI Refusal to Accept Compounding Applications Under Foreign Exchange Management Act. The Court Examines the Compounding Process and the Validity of the 2017 Amendment to Rule 8(2) Barring Compounding When Section 37A Proceedings Are Contemplated.
26 Jun 2018The petitioner, a public limited news broadcasting company, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the actio...
- 61
High Court
High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Commercial Division, Adjudicates Arbitration Petition Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act — Challenge to Arbitral Award in Indian Premier League Franchise Dispute. Award Directed Payment of Damages and Interest to Franchisee; Petition Alleges Patent Illegality and Excess of Jurisdiction by Arbitrator.
16 Jun 2021The dispute arose from the termination of a franchise agreement between the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI), the governing body for crick...
- 21
