Search Results for "Recovery Panchanama"

1676 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1676 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Life Imprisonment for School Teacher in POCSO Case — Conviction Based on Child Victim's Testimony and Medical Evidence Found Reliable.

The appellant, Kesarinandan Sabhapati Upadhyay, was convicted by the Special Judge, Greater Mumbai, under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Murder Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Unreliable Circumstantial Links. Conviction under Sections 302 and 203 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Mahavir Jingonda Patil, was convicted by the 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, Kolhapur in Sessions Case No.18 of 1990 for the murder of h...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Arson Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Credible Witnesses. Conviction under Sections 427 and 436 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Suyash Rajiv Mulukh, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Jalgaon, for offences under Sections 427 (mischief causing damage)...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder and Robbery Case Due to Lack of Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction Based on Last Seen Theory and Recovery of Stolen Articles Fails as Circumstantial Evidence Does Not Form Complete Chain Pointing to Guilt Under Sections 302 and 392 of Indian Penal Code, 1860.

The appellant, Radhe Zulidas Mandal, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Bombay in Sessions Case No. 34 of 2012 for offences under...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Witnesses and Incomplete Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Sections 302, 201 read with 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellants, Laxman Baban Waghe and Ramu @ Ramdas Budhya Waghe, original accused Nos. 3 and 4, were convicted by the II Additional Sessions Judge, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 661 OF 2005

The case arose from Special Case No. 10 of 2001 before the III Additional Sessions Judge, Raigad, where eight accused faced trial on charges of kidnap...