Search Results for "Non Bailable Warrant"

347 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 347 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellants for Robbery Under Section 392 IPC. Identification by Witnesses and Recovery of Stolen Property Sufficient to Sustain Conviction.

The case involves two criminal appeals arising from a common judgment of conviction dated 24.3.2004 passed by the 1st Ad hoc Additional Sessions Judge...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Dowry Harassment Case Due to Settlement Between Parties — Section 498A IPC and Section 4 Dowry Prohibition Act. Compromise reached between husband and wife leads to quashing of FIR and all proceedings in C.C.No.15166/2020.

The petitioners, who are the husband (accused No.1), mother-in-law (accused No.2), and father-in-law (accused No.3), filed a criminal petition under S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Considers Revision Against Summons for Offence Under Section 92 of Factories Act, 1948 for Alleged Violation of Rule 79-A(b) of Karnataka Factories Rules, 1969. Director Argues Lack of Vicarious Liability and Procedural Flaws, but Full Order Not Available.

The revision petition was filed by a director of Hindustan Coca-Cola Beverages Pvt. Ltd., a company engaged in manufacturing beverages, seeking to qua...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Cognizance Order in POCSO Act Case Due to Lack of Sanction Under Section 23. Journalists' Prosecution for Publishing Victim's Identity Without Proper Authorization Fails as Sanction Requirement Not Satisfied.

The petitioners, Gangadhar Narayan Nayak and Nagaraj Ganapati Naik, were accused Nos. 1 and 2 in Special Case No. 25/2018 pending before the Additiona...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Accused in Forgery and Criminal Conspiracy Case. Accused convicted under Sections 468 and 120B IPC for forging a medical certificate to claim false compensation.

The judgment concerns three criminal revision applications filed by Dinguram Ramaji Sangore, Dinbandhu Fatik Samaddar, and Tridev Vikas Mujumdar again...