High Court of Karnataka Considers Batch of Petitions Under Section 482 Cr.P.C. Challenging Revisional Court's Orders Dated 28.02.2022. Petitions Seek to Set Aside Orders and Allow Applications Under Section 319 of Cr.P.C.
30 Sep 2022...
Search Results for "Limited Liability Partnership"
775 result(s) found
Found 775 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Blacklisting Orders Against Two Firms in WCL Tender Dispute — Lack of Opportunity of Hearing Violates Principles of Natural Justice. The court held that blacklisting a contractor without prior notice and hearing is arbitrary and unsustainable under Article 14 of the Constitution.
30 Nov 2023The petitioners, M/s H.D. Enterprises (HDE) and M/s Gaurav Contracts Company (GCC), had entered into a joint venture/consortium agreement on 23.05.201...
- 49
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Allows Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Claimant as Driver-cum-Owner Not Entitled to Compensation Under Section 163-A of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The court held that a claimant who is the driver-cum-owner of the offending vehicle cannot maintain a claim petition under Section 163-A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, as the provision is intended for third parties and not for the owner/driver of the vehicle involved in the accident.
23 Jan 2023The present appeal was filed by the Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. challenging the judgment and award dated 11.09.2014 passed by the Principal Senior...
- 93
High Court
Special Court Convicts Broker and Beneficiaries in BMC Bank Securities Fraud; Acquits Employees and Other Brokers. Broker Held Liable for Dishonest Receipt of Stolen Property Under Section 411 IPC, While Beneficiaries Convicted of Cheating Under Section 420 IPC.
18 Jan 2014The case involved a criminal trial before the Special Court under the Special Court (Trial of Offences Relating to Transactions in Securities) Act, 19...
- 65
High Court
High Court Allows Petition Under Section 11(6) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for Appointment of Sole Arbitrator in Railway Contract Dispute. Court Appoints Retired Judge as Arbitrator After Respondents Failed to Appoint Arbitrator Despite Invocation of Arbitration Clause.
2 Jan 2019The petitioner, M/s Shri. Narasimhaswami Constructions, a partnership firm, entered into a contract agreement with the respondents, the South Western ...
- 165
High Court
Bombay High Court Considers GST Liability on Royalty Payments to Court Receiver in Commercial Property Dispute. The Court Examines Whether Payments to a Court Receiver Under Order XL CPC Constitute Taxable Supply Under the CGST Act, 2017 and Whether GST Should be Discharged via Reverse Charge Mechanism.
13 Sep 2019The Bombay High Court, in a Court Receiver's Report arising from a commercial suit for recovery of possession of three shops used as a restaurant, exa...
- 44
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Arbitration Petition Challenging Arbitral Award on Grounds of Patent Illegality and Public Policy. Court sets aside award for ignoring contractual terms and failing to consider counterclaims.
29 Oct 2015The judgment concerns two arbitration petitions arising out of the same arbitral award. The petitioners (original respondents) challenged the award un...
- 119
High Court
Bombay High Court Delivers Oral Judgment on Petitions Challenging SEBI's Show Cause Notices to Auditors of Satyam Computers. Question of SEBI's Jurisdiction under Sections 11, 11B, and 11(4) of SEBI Act Raised in Wake of Satyam Fraud Disclosure.
13 Aug 2010The matter arose from writ petitions filed by Price Waterhouse & Co. and other chartered accountant firms along with individual partners challenging t...
- 63
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Revision and Appeal in Dishonour of Cheque Case, Sets Aside Conviction Due to Lack of Proper Service of Notice. The court held that without proper service of notice under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, the conviction cannot be sustained.
2 May 2019The case involves a dispute under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The complainant, Vinodkumar Rathi, alleged that the accused, M/...
- 125
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Criminal Application for Quashing Summons in Security Guards Act Violation. Allegations Against Officers as Principal Employers Prima Facie Disclose Offence Under Clause 42 of Maharashtra Private Security Guards Scheme, 2002.
10 May 2013The matter arose from a criminal complaint filed by Inspector R.D. Khanorkar under the Maharashtra Private Security Guards (Regulation of Employment a...
- 56
