Search Results for "Limitation Act"

228 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 228 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Dargah Land Dispute, Upholds Mutawalis' Right to Possession. Suit for Possession Based on Title Governed by 12-Year Limitation Under Article 65 of Limitation Act, 1963.

The case involves a dispute over agricultural lands situated at village Haregaon, Tq. Ausa, Dist. Latur, claimed by the plaintiffs (respondents herein...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against Rejection of Plaint Rejection Application in Testamentary Case Under Section 228 of Indian Succession Act — Limitation Not Applicable to First Petition for Letters of Administration in India Despite Prior Foreign Probate

The Supreme Court dismissed an appeal against the High Court's refusal to reject a plaint under Order VII Rule 11 CPC in a testamentary case. The disp...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Adverse Possession Case — Declares Plaintiff Owner of Encroached Land. Court Holds That Mere Long Possession Without Hostility and Knowledge Does Not Confer Title by Adverse Possession Under Limitation Act, 1963.

The appellant, Mallikarjunaiah, filed a civil suit seeking declaration of title and injunction in respect of certain agricultural lands, including 1 G...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses HUDA's Appeal Due to Inordinate Delay of 1942 Days in Filing Second Appeal. Statutory Authority's Negligence in Timely Filing Does Not Constitute Sufficient Cause Under Section 5 of Limitation Act.

The case involves an appeal by the Haryana Urban Development Authority (HUDA) against the dismissal of their second appeal by the Punjab & Haryana Hig...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Urban Land Ceiling Case — Upholds Vesting of Land in State and Rejects Ownership Claim. The Court held that the plaintiffs failed to prove their title and that the suit was barred by res judicata and limitation.

The case involves a dispute over land bearing No.73, Canal Circular Road, Calcutta, which was part of a larger parcel of land. The plaintiffs, claimin...