Search Results for "Land Assignment"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "Land Assignment"

586 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 586 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Forest Land Dispute — Patta Claim Fails for Lack of Original Title Documents. Notification Under Repealed Act Not Invalid if Consistent with New Law; Revenue Entries Without Supporting Documents Lack Evidentiary Value.

6 May 2026

The case involves a dispute over 600 acres of land in Survey No. 81, Kalvalanagaram Village, Khammam District (now in Telangana). The Appellants claim...

High Court

Madras High Court Upholds Demolition of Illegal Constructions on Water Bodies in Tamil Nadu. Court Directs Removal of Encroachments and Restoration of Water Bodies to Protect Environment and Public Interest Under Public Trust Doctrine and Article 21.

6 Apr 2026

This batch of writ petitions was filed by various individuals and associations challenging the demolition of constructions on water bodies and river b...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals Against Condonation of 586-Day Delay and Grant of Leave to Appeal to Pendente Lite Purchasers in Specific Performance Suit. The Court held that subsequent purchasers who purchased property during pendency of suit and in violation of injunction cannot claim bona fide status and have no right to appeal after their impleadment application was rejected and became final.

1 Jan 2025

The case involves appeals by the original plaintiffs (H. Anjanappa & Ors.) against an order of the Karnataka High Court condoning a delay of 586 days ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition by Asset Reconstruction Company Against District Magistrate's Order Under SARFAESI Act — District Magistrate's Order Quashed for Lack of Jurisdiction and Violation of Natural Justice. The court held that the District Magistrate cannot adjudicate upon the validity of assignment of debt under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002, and must hear the secured creditor before passing any adverse order.

20 Aug 2022

The petitioners, Phoenix ARC Private Limited (an Asset Reconstruction Company registered under the SARFAESI Act) and its authorized representative, fi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Bank and Employees in Loan Dispute — Dispute Held Purely Civil, No Prima Facie Case of Cheating or Criminal Breach of Trust. Allegations of Forgery and Use of Forged Documents Also Not Made Out, FIR Quashed Under Section 482 CrPC.

2 Aug 2022

The judgment arises from two writ petitions filed by ICICI Bank Ltd., its employees (Zarin Daruwala, Girish Nayak, Arati Ramakrishnan, Vipul Parmar, K...

High Court

High Court Dismisses Bank's Revision in SARFAESI Act Suit — Civil Court Jurisdiction Not Barred. Suit for Declaration and Injunction Regarding Personal Guarantee Held Maintainable as It Does Not Relate to Enforcement of Security Interest Under Section 34 of SARFAESI Act.

20 Jul 2017

The case involves a civil revision application filed by Allahabad Bank against an order of the Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division, Nagpur, rejecting t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Interim Compensation Order in Lease Dispute. Appellate court's order granting interim compensation under Section 43(1) of the Presidency Small Cause Courts Act, 1882 upheld as compensatory and not penal.

5 May 2017

The petitioners, heirs of the original lessee Hashambhai Jetha, were granted a lease of a plot of land admeasuring 3341 sq. yards by an Indenture of L...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application for Recall/Review of Order Allowing Secured Creditor to Release Leasehold Rights. Applicant, an ex-director and guarantor, lacked locus standi as he was not a party to the original application and no fraud or mistake was established.

30 Jul 2013

The judgment concerns an application filed by Mr Shashikant Pasari, an ex-director and guarantor of Rajan (Textile) Mills Pvt Ltd (in liquidation), se...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit for Possession Under Section 6 of Specific Relief Act, 1963 — Plaintiffs Failed to Prove Prior Possession and Dispossession Within Six Months. Court Held That Summary Suit Under Section 6 Cannot Be Used to Decide Title and Requires Strict Proof of Possession and Unlawful Dispossession.

4 May 2012

The plaintiffs, including Amod Nandkishore Mehra and others, filed a suit under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963, seeking restoration of pos...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Property Suit — Finds Substantial Question of Law on Adverse Possession and Co-owner's Possession. Court holds that possession of one co-owner is possession of all co-owners unless there is ouster, and that the trial court and first appellate court erred in not considering this principle under the Limitation Act, 1963.

30 Nov -0001

The present second appeal arises from a suit for possession and declaration of title filed by the original plaintiffs (respondents herein) against the...

20 21 22 23 24

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)