Search Results for "Fraudulent Issuance"

468 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 468 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal Against Injunction Restraining Bank from Enforcing Corporate Guarantee. The court set aside the injunction as the guarantee deed was unconditional and the bank had a prima facie case under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 of CPC, enabling it to proceed under SARFAESI Act and IBC.

The appeal arose from an order dated 25.07.2024 passed by the LXXXV Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru (Commercial Court) in I.A. No....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Cheating Case Due to Civil Nature of Dispute. Failure to Perform Contractual Obligations Does Not Attract Criminal Liability Under Sections 406 and 420 IPC Without Proof of Fraudulent Intent at Inception.

The case involves a criminal writ petition filed by V.B. Padode and M/s. Dataline and Research Technologies (I) Ltd. (the petitioners) challenging the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Accused in Cheating Case Due to Civil Nature of Dispute and Lack of Criminal Intent. Failure to Perform Contractual Obligation Does Not Attract Offences Under Sections 406, 420, 120B IPC Without Evidence of Dishonest Intention at Inception.

The judgment arises from a criminal application and writ petition filed by Mahendra Premji Gangar and Kalyanji Premji Gangar (applicants/petitioners),...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging SEBI Recovery Proceedings and Civil Imprisonment Order for Non-Payment of Dues. Recovery Officer's Order for Arrest and Detention of Defaulter Under Section 28A of SEBI Act, 1992 Upheld as Valid Exercise of Powers.

The petitioner, Vinod Hinigorani, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the validity of orders dated 18.12....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Protection in Service for Employee with Invalid Caste Certificate. Employee who gave up challenge to caste invalidation order granted reinstatement without back wages or reservation benefits.

The petitioner, Rajendra s/o Ramaji Mahisbadwe, was employed with National Aviation Company of India Limited (NACIL) based on a caste certificate clai...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Restricts Provisional Attachment to Disputed Amount in MVAT Act Case — Section 48(5) Constitutional Challenge Rejected. Court holds that attachment under Section 35 must be proportionate, and directs respondents to limit attachment to Rs.1.81 crores.

The petitioner, M/s. Premium Paper and Board Industries Ltd., a registered dealer under the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002 (MVAT Act) and the C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Tenancy Dispute — No Offence Made Out Under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 IPC. Criminal prosecution for alleged forgery of lease deed and cheating fails as civil tenancy proceedings were pending and no fraudulent intention was established.

The judgment arises from two connected criminal writ petitions filed before the Bombay High Court, Bench at Aurangabad. The first petition (Criminal W...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by Partnership Firm and Partner Against Penalty Under Customs Act — Double Jeopardy Plea Rejected. Penalty on firm and partner under Section 112 of Customs Act, 1962 is permissible as firm is a separate entity for penalty purposes.

The appeal arose from an order of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) dated 12 February 2004, which reduced penalties impo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Magistrate's Order Refusing to Issue Process Under Section 406 IPC in License Agreement Dispute. Court Held That Dispute Was Purely Civil in Nature and No Criminal Offence Was Made Out.

The petitioner, Sharan P Khanna, owned certain premises and entered into a license agreement with respondent No.1, Oil & Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. ...