Search Results for "Appeal Against Conviction"

7206 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 7206 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Appeals Against Conviction in Arson and Murder Case. Accused Challenged Conviction Under Sections 302, 436, 342, 143, 147, 148, 149, 120B IPC; State Filed Appeal Seeking Enhancement of Sentence.

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay adjudicated eight criminal appeals filed against the judgment dated 9 May 2005 by the 4th Additional Sessions J...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Considers Appeal Against Discharge in POCSO Case. The Court Examines the Validity of the High Court's Order that Affirmed the Discharge of School Officials Accused of Failing to Report a Sexual Assault on a Minor.

This appeal arises from a Special Leave Petition (Criminal) No. 4772 of 2024, filed by the mother of an eight-year-old minor victim of sexual assault....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Appeal Against Trial Court's Order Refusing to Summon Defence Witnesses in MCOC Case. Issue Pertains to Relevance of Confessions of Other Accused Persons Recorded Under Section 18 of MCOC Act in a Separate Trial.

The appeal before the Bombay High Court arose from an order passed by the Special Court under the Maharashtra Control of Organized Crime Act, 1999 (MC...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against Refusal to Discharge Accused in Fake Currency Case. Prima Facie Evidence of Involvement Found Sufficient for Trial Under Sections 489B and 489C IPC.

The appellant, Dipakbhai Jagdishchandra Patel, was implicated in a case involving the possession and sale of counterfeit Saudi Arabian Riyal currency ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Dowry Death Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Harassment Soon Before Death. Conviction under Section 304-B IPC and Section 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act Set Aside as Demand for Money Not Proved to Be Dowry Demand.

The appeal was filed by Radhakisan Kachru Khandagale (appellant No. 1) and his father Kachru Raghunath Khandagale (appellant No. 2) challenging their ...