Search Results for "victim statement language"

742 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 742 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Kidnapping Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Age Discrepancy. Prosecution Fails to Prove Victim Was Under 18 Years or That Accused Took Her Without Consent Under Section 363 IPC.

The appellant, Mubarak, was convicted by the Second Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bangalore, in Special Case No.176/2006 for offences unde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction for Kidnapping for Ransom in Panchkula Case — Life Imprisonment Maintained. Circumstantial evidence including call detail records and IMEI numbers sufficient to prove guilt under Sections 364A, 392, 120B IPC.

The appellants were convicted by the trial court for kidnapping a boy, Sachin Garg, for ransom, robbery, and criminal conspiracy under the Indian Pena...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Commutes Death Sentence to Life Imprisonment in Rape and Murder of Minor - Rarest of Rare Doctrine Not Satisfied. Circumstantial Evidence and Possibility of Reformation Mitigate Against Death Penalty Under Section 302 IPC.

The Supreme Court of India heard an appeal against the death sentence imposed on Raju Jagdish Paswan for the rape and murder of a 9-year-old girl. The...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Anticipatory Bail Application in POCSO and Atrocities Act Case - Section 42-A POCSO Act Prevails Over Section 14-A Atrocities Act, Making Section 438 CrPC Maintainable.

The case involved an anticipatory bail application under Section 438 CrPC by Aniket Labade, accused of offences under IPC, POCSO Act, and SC/ST Act. T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Dacoity Case Due to Flawed Identification Parade and Lack of Evidence. Test Identification Parade Held Without Following Criminal Manual Para 16 Rendered Identification Evidence Inadmissible.

The appellants, original accused Nos. 1 to 5, were convicted by the Additional District & Sessions Judge, Gadhinglaj, Kolhapur in Sessions Case No. 14...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Rape Case, Holds Offences Under Sections 376, 504, 506 IPC Form Same Transaction for Joint Trial Under Section 220 CrPC. The Court set aside the discharge of the accused for lack of territorial jurisdiction and directed trial for all offences together.

The Supreme Court allowed an appeal against the High Court's order upholding the discharge of the accused-respondent No. 2 for the offence under Secti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Hears Appeals Against Conviction for Abduction, Murder, Robbery, and Conspiracy. The Appellants Contended That Lodging Two FIRs for the Same Transaction Vitiated the Trial and That Circumstantial Evidence Was Insufficient.

The High Court of Bombay at Goa heard four criminal appeals against a common judgment of the Sessions Court in Sessions Case No. 50/2009, which convic...