Search Results for "undivided Hindu joint family"

347 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 347 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With Under Section 100 CPC. Suit for partition dismissed as plaintiff failed to prove joint family property and possession; no substantial question of law arose.

The present second appeal was filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) by the defendant No.1 challenging the judgment and de...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Benami Property Dispute Under Benami Transaction (Prohibition) Act, 1988. Plaintiffs Failed to Prove Property Was Held for Benefit of Hindu Undivided Family Coparceners Under Section 4(3)(a), Making Suit Barred Under Section 4(1).

The dispute originated from a civil suit filed by Laxmi Prasad, his wife, and two daughters against his two sons and subsequent purchasers, seeking de...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Family Members Challenging Additional Collector's Order Setting Aside Mutation Entry in Partition of Hindu Undivided Family Land. Third Party Without Locus Standi Cannot Oppose Mutation Entry Among Family Members.

The petitioners, Manikchand Hiralal Nahar and his two sons, filed a writ petition challenging the order of the Additional Collector, Beed, which set a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Executor's Application for Probate in Will Dispute — Caveat Dismissed for Lack of Interest. Court held that a caveator claiming under an unproduced Will has no caveatable interest under Section 284 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925.

The case involves a Notice of Motion filed by Daya Subhash Tiwari, the applicant and original petitioner in a probate petition, seeking dismissal of a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Disposes of Appeals by Authority for Advance Rulings Against High Court Judgment Quashing AAR's Rejection of Treaty Benefits. Questions Raised on Taxation of Capital Gains Under India-Mauritius DTAA and Scope of Section 245R(2) Proviso (iii) of Income Tax Act, 1961.

The disputes arose from applications for advance ruling filed by three Mauritius-incorporated companies—Tiger Global International II Holdings, Tige...