KAHC010822332025_1
8 Jul 2026The Division Bench of the High Court of Karnataka heard two intra-court writ appeals filed by M/s MP24 Construction Company, the lead member of a cons...
Search Results for "stay discretionary power"
637 result(s) found
Found 637 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Enforcement of SDM's Order on Removal of Unauthorised Parking and Encroachments. Directs Authorities to Implement Order and Frame Guidelines to Ensure Free Traffic Movement Under Motor Vehicles Act and Municipal Laws.
7 Jun 2006The petitioners, residents of Chandrapur, filed a criminal writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus to ...
- 21
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Defendant in Commercial Suit to File Written Statement Despite Expiry of 120-Day Limit Due to COVID-19 Disruptions. Time Limit Under Proviso to Order VIII Rule 1 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 as Substituted by Commercial Courts Act, 2015 Extended Considering Orders in Suo Motu Writ Petition (Civil) No. 3 of 2020 and Administrative Curtailment of Court Functioning.
14 Feb 2022The dispute arose from a commercial suit filed by the plaintiff-respondent against the defendant-appellant for recovery of Rs. 3,73,24,821/- with inte...
- 700
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Hears Consolidated Writ Petitions Challenging Forest Development Tax Notification Under Karnataka Forest Act. Petitioners Contended That the Levy on Mineral-Bearing Land Violated Article 246, Entry 54 of Union List, and Forest Conservation Act, 1980.
3 Dec 2015The High Court of Karnataka, Bengaluru, heard a batch of writ petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India by several minin...
- 62
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Wrongful Arrest of Vessel Case — Duty to Mitigate Under Section 73 Contract Act Does Not Apply to Undertaking Under Rule 941 of Bombay High Court (Original Side) Rules, 1980. The court held that the undertaking under Rule 941 is a contractual obligation independent of the duty to mitigate damages, and the plaintiff must pay damages as per the undertaking without reduction for failure to mitigate.
5 Nov 2014The case involves an appeal by Rainbow Ace Shipping S.A., the owner of the vessel MV Rainbow Ace, against an order of the learned single Judge of the ...
- 143
High Court
Gujarat High Court Quashes Charge Sheet and Show-Cause Notice in Departmental Proceedings for Lack of Jurisdiction and Violation of Natural Justice. The court held that the disciplinary authority lacked jurisdiction to issue charge sheet and show-cause notice, and principles of natural justice were violated.
10 Mar 2026The petitioner, Pritamkumar Ramanbhai Gamit, filed a Special Civil Application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Gujarat High ...
- 158
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Private Complaints for Dishonour of Cheque Over Rs. 1 Crore Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. Section 142(2) of NI Act Does Not Mandate Police Investigation, Private Complaint Maintainable.
10 Apr 2024The case involved a reference made by a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court regarding the interpretation of Section 142(2) of the Negotiable...
- 44
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Tahsildar's Order Cancelling Mutation Entries in Tenancy Land Dispute — Exceeds Jurisdiction Under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code. Tahsildar Cannot Cancel Certificate Issued Under Section 38(E) of Hyderabad Tenancy and Agricultural Land Act, 1950, as Such Power Lies Only with Revenue Tribunal or Civil Court.
16 Oct 2025The petitioners, legal heirs of tenants Ganpati Kundlik Kurule and Abaji Ramji Jadhav, challenged the order dated 04.09.2025 passed by the Tahsildar, ...
- 338
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Section 14 SARFAESI Act Order for Police Aid — No Locus Standi for Borrower's Partner After Property Sold to Third Party. The Court held that once the secured asset is sold and possession handed over to the auction purchaser, the borrower or its partner has no right to challenge the Section 14 order, and the remedy lies before the DRT under Section 17 of the SARFAESI Act.
9 Oct 2015The petitioners, M/s. National Laminate Corporation (a partnership firm) and its partner Mr. Jayantilal L. Nisar, filed a writ petition under Article ...
- 198
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Attachment and Sale of Residential Bungalow in Income Tax Recovery Proceedings. Order Beyond Limitation Period Under Rule 68B(3) of Second Schedule and Non-Compliance with Proclamation Requirements Render Sale Invalid.
5 Jun 2017The case involved a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the attachment and proposed sale of a residential bungalo...
- 46
