KAHC010479002008_1
3 Dec 2015The High Court of Karnataka, Bengaluru, heard a consolidated batch of writ petitions filed by various entities including National Mineral Development ...
Search Results for "section 391"
569 result(s) found
Found 569 result(s)
Supreme Court
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 7370 OF 2026
1 Jan 1970The present Civil Appeal arises from a suit for declaration of ownership of agricultural properties based on a Will dated 20.04.2018, allegedly execut...
- 63
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Challenge to BDA Land Acquisition Notifications for Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout. Petitioners Seek Quashing of Preliminary Notification Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 and Final Notification Under BDA Act, 1976.
11 Jul 2014This batch of writ petitions was filed by various land owners under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging land acquisition not...
- 97
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Resolves Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging Land Acquisition for 'Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout'. The Petitioners Sought to Quash Preliminary Notification Dated 21.05.2008 and Final Notification Dated 18.02.2010 Issued by Bangalore Development Authority.
11 Jul 2014A large batch of writ petitions came before the High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore, filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. T...
- 66
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Ejectment of Tenant in Delhi Rent Control Act Case Due to Second Default and Limitation Bar on Standard Rent Claim. Proviso to Section 14(2) Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 Mandatory, Precluding Second Benefit, and Tenant Cannot Circumvent Limitation Under Section 12 by Raising Standard Rent as Defense in Ejectment Proceedings.
15 Sep 1969The dispute arose from a landlord-tenant relationship governed by the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958. The appellant, Man Mohan Chawla, had been a tenant...
- 26
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Hears Consolidated Writ Petitions Challenging Forest Development Tax Notification Under Karnataka Forest Act. Petitioners Contended That the Levy on Mineral-Bearing Land Violated Article 246, Entry 54 of Union List, and Forest Conservation Act, 1980.
3 Dec 2015The High Court of Karnataka, Bengaluru, heard a batch of writ petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India by several minin...
- 66
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses State Appeal in Gujarat Control of Terrorism and Organised Crime Act Case — Continuing Unlawful Activity Requires Post-Promulgation Offence. The Court held that the prosecution must prove that the accused committed an organised crime after the Act came into force, and mere prior charge-sheets are insufficient to invoke the Act.
15 Dec 2022The State of Gujarat appealed against the High Court's order granting bail to the respondent-accused, Sandip Omprakash Gupta, who was charged under Se...
- 240
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Accused's Appeal in Cheque Dishonour Case Upholding Rejection of Additional Evidence Application. Appellate Court Correctly Refused to Assist Accused in Collecting Defence Evidence Under Section 391 CrPC as Presumption Under Section 118 NI Act Favors Complainant and Accused Failed to Rebut It Despite Opportunity.
29 Jan 2024The Supreme Court heard an appeal by special leave challenging the High Court of Gujarat's order dated 25th October 2023, which rejected the appellant...
- 301
High Court
Bombay High Court pronounces judgment on Letters Patent appeals in oppression and mismanagement case under Companies Act, 1956 — dispute over diversion of Contship agency business. The Court examined whether directors' diversion of business opportunity amounted to oppression and breach of fiduciary duty under Sections 397, 398 of the Companies Act, 1956 and Section 88 of the Indian Trusts Act, 1882.
31 Mar 2006The appeals arose from a dispute between the Puri Group and the Sippy Group, both holding equal shares and equal directorships in two private Indian s...
- 22
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Remands Oppression Petition in Share Allotment Dispute Under Sections 397/398 of Companies Act, 1956 — Preference Shareholder's Voting Rights and Validity of Allotments Require Reconsideration. The Court held that the allotments were made in compliance with Section 81(1A) but the High Court failed to properly assess the allegations of oppression, necessitating a fresh hearing by the Company Law Board.
10 May 2019The appeal arose from a judgment of the Delhi High Court which set aside an order of the Company Law Board (CLB) in a petition under Sections 397 and ...
- 314
