WRIT PETITION NO.9189 of 2010
5 May 2011The matter arose out of a dispute over the setting up of a new private sugar factory. Khandoba Prasanna Sakhar Karkhana Limited and Sahyadri Sahakari ...
Search Results for "retrospective grant"
1198 result(s) found
Found 1198 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Raman & Raman Ltd. in Stage Carriage Permit Matter, Quashing Appellate Authority's Order. Section 43A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939, Holds Only Administrative Power; Directions Issued Are Not Law and Cannot Affect Prior Permits.
18 Feb 1959The appellant, M/s. Raman & Raman Ltd., was one of several applicants for a stage carriage permit. The Regional Transport Authority granted the permit...
- 72
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Transitional Input Tax Credit Under GST — Time Limit for Filing TRAN-1 Form Held Directory, Not Mandatory. The court directed the GST authorities to accept the TRAN-1 Form filed beyond the prescribed time limit, holding that the time limit was directory and the petitioner had sufficient cause for delay.
20 Mar 2020The petitioner, Nelco Limited, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, supplies and undertakes various network-related services. It file...
- 87
High Court
High Court of Judicature at Bombay Examines Challenge to Assessment Order Restricting Sales Tax Incentives under Package Scheme of Incentives, 1993. Expansion Unit Seeks Quashing of Order Alleging It Is Without Jurisdiction and Contrary to Scheme Terms.
14 Aug 2018The petitioner, Mahindra & Mahindra Limited, a company engaged in the manufacture and sale of automobiles and spare parts, filed a writ petition befor...
- 15
High Court
High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru Hears Petitions for Regularization of Services of Bangalore University Employees. Petitioners Sought Formal Orders of Regularization Pursuant to Government Directives and Earlier Court Orders.
28 Feb 2022Multiple writ petitions were filed by employees working in various capacities at Bangalore University. The petitioners sought regularization of their ...
- 75
High Court
Bombay High Court Hears Batch of Petitions Challenging APMC Nagpur Election Process and Government Orders Extending Board Tenure
16 Jan 2018The judgment pertains to multiple writ petitions and a contempt petition concerning the elections and administration of the Agricultural Produce Marke...
- 67
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds State Legislation on Internal Reservation for Backward Classes in Tamil Nadu - The Court reversed the High Court's declaration of unconstitutionality, holding that sub-classification within Most Backward Classes and Denotified Communities is permissible under Articles 15(4) and 16(4) of the Constitution of India, 1950, based on commission recommendations and historical data.
31 Mar 2022The dispute arose from the Tamil Nadu Special Reservation of seats in Educational Institutions including Private Educational Institutions and of appoi...
- 930
High Court
Bombay High Court Sanctions Scheme of Amalgamation Between Casby CFS Pvt. Ltd. and Casby Logistics Pvt. Ltd. Under Section 394 of Companies Act, 1956 — Restructuring of Casby Group Approved. Court found the scheme fair, reasonable, and not contrary to public interest, with no objections from Regional Director.
19 Mar 2015The judgment concerns a petition filed by Casby CFS Pvt. Ltd. (Transferor) and Casby Logistics Pvt. Ltd. (Transferee) seeking sanction of a scheme of ...
- 102
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Tax Authorities in Madras Urban Land Tax Act — Act Held Constitutionally Valid. Levy of 0.4% on Market Value of Urban Land Under Madras Urban Land Tax Act, 1966 Not Violative of Articles 14 and 19(1)(f), and Retrospective Operation Reasonable.
11 Apr 1969The case concerned the constitutional validity of the Madras Urban Land Tax Act, 1966, which levied a tax on urban land at 0.4% of its market value. T...
- 64
High Court
The High Court of Karnataka Division Bench heard writ appeals against the order of the learned Single Judge in a service matter involving judicial officers. The appeals were filed under Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act, 1961, challenging the order dated 27-09-2013 in WP Nos. 41684-691/2012.
3 Apr 2014These writ appeals, filed under Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act, 1961, arise from a common order dated 27-09-2013 passed by a learned Single...
- 66
