Search Results for "reopening notice"

599 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 599 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act for Lack of Fresh Material — Search Action Under Section 132 Cannot Be Basis for Reopening Beyond Four Years Without New Tangible Evidence.

The petitioner, Mahesh Dharamshi Prajapati, an individual and major partner of PSY Group engaged in real estate business, filed his return of income f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act for Lack of Reason to Believe. Transfer of Development Rights Not Constituting Transfer Under Section 2(47) of Income Tax Act, 1961.

The petitioner, Late Bharat Jayantilal Patel (since deceased through legal heir Smt. Minal Bharat Patel), challenged a notice issued under Section 148...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice in Income Tax Case Due to Lack of Fresh Material. Reopening of Assessment Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 Held Invalid When Income Was Already Subject of Block Assessment and Regular Assessment.

The petitioners, Audhut Timblo and Anju Timblo, challenged a notice dated 18.10.2006 issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the asse...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening of Assessment in Income Tax Case — Change of Opinion Not Permissible Beyond Four Years. Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 Set Aside as No Failure to Disclose Material Facts Was Alleged.

The petitioner, Shriram Foundry Ltd., challenged a notice dated 10 February 2011 issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, seeking to reop...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening of Assessment for UK Insurance Company in Income Tax Case — Lack of Fresh Material and Change of Opinion. Reopening under Section 147 of Income Tax Act, 1961 based on mere change of opinion without new tangible material is invalid.

The petitioner, The Prudential Assurance Company Ltd., a UK-incorporated insurance company registered as a sub-account of a Foreign Institutional Inve...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notices in Sales Tax Case Due to Lack of Reasonable Belief — Reopening Based on Mere Suspicion and Incomplete Information Held Invalid Under Section 35 of Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959 and Rule 9A of Central Sales Tax (Bombay) Rules, 1957.

The petitioners, Shree Venkateshwara Petro Chemicals Pvt. Ltd. and another, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India chall...