Search Results for "reopening after four years"

343 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 343 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice in Income Tax Case Due to Lack of Failure to Disclose Material Facts. Reassessment Beyond Four Years Invalid as Original Assessment Was Scrutiny Assessment and No Failure to Disclose Was Shown.

The petitioner, an individual assessee, filed his income tax return for assessment year 2013-14 on 27 September 2013, declaring taxable income of Rs.7...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Income Tax Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 — Petitioner Failed to Show That No Income Escaped Assessment.

The petitioner, Darshana Anand Damle, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court challenging a ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act for Lack of Reasonable Belief and Change of Opinion. Reassessment Beyond Four Years Invalid Without Proof of Failure to Disclose Material Facts.

The petitioner, Vedanta Limited (formerly Sterlite Opportunities and Ventures Limited), challenged a notice dated 28 March 2008 issued under Section 1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income-tax Act, 1961 for Lack of Independent Application of Mind. Reopening Based on Borrowed Satisfaction from Investigation Wing Without Fresh Material Held Invalid.

The petitioner, Welcome Plywood Pvt. Ltd., challenged a notice under Section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 dated 13 March 2015 proposing to reassess...