Search Results for "removal motion"

501 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 501 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Appeal and Contempt Petition in Demolition Dispute -- Petitioner Challenge to BMC's Demolition Order Under BMC Act Fails, Contempt Allegations Rejected

The Appellant, filed an Appeal against the dismissal of a Notice of Motion seeking an interim injunction to restrain the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corpor...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Labour Welfare Fund Cess as Unconstitutional. Levy under Maharashtra Labour Welfare Fund Act, 1953 held to be a fee for services rendered, not a tax, and validly imposed on establishments including those with contract labour.

The petitioner, Mohan Dhotre, a resident of Mumbai, filed a writ petition challenging the constitutional validity of the levy under the Maharashtra La...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Disposes PIL on Footpath Encroachments with Directions for Removal and Monitoring. Court holds that encroachments on public footpaths violate pedestrian rights and must be cleared by municipal authorities, with compliance monitored by District Legal Services Authority.

The petitioner, D.S. Ramachandra Reddy, an advocate, filed a public interest litigation under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application for Perjury Proceedings in Property Dispute — No Prima Facie Case of False Evidence Established Under Section 340 CrPC. Court Hears Accused on Preliminary Issue and Finds Allegations Unsubstantiated.

The judgment concerns a Civil Application filed under Section 340 read with Section 195 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, by Satyanarayan Nandk...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Passes Interim Orders Directing Restoration of Lake and Prevention of Mangrove Destruction in Navi Mumbai. Modification of Development Plan to Permit Golf Course Raised Public Interest Concerns.

The public interest litigations were filed to address the systematic destruction of mangroves and wetlands in Navi Mumbai. The petitioners in PIL 218/...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Arbitration Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Land Acquisition Compensation Dispute. Court holds that arbitrator erred in rejecting claim for interest on delayed payment of compensation and in not awarding solatium under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The petitioners, Kekobad Dossabhoy Doongriwalla and Khorshed Navzar Wadia, filed an arbitration petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conci...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Order Holding Suit Maintainable Despite MRTP Act Bar. Civil Court Jurisdiction Not Ousted Under Section 149 of MRTP Act Where Dispute Involves Title and Possession, Not Just Planning Violations.

The case involves a civil revision application under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging an order dated 22/3/2013 passed by ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit for Specific Performance of Slum Development Agreement Due to Lack of Jurisdiction Under Section 42 of Maharashtra Slum Areas Act. Civil Court Cannot Entertain Disputes Relating to Slum Rehabilitation Schemes as Exclusive Jurisdiction Vests with Slum Authorities.

The plaintiff, Lokhandwala Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., filed a suit for specific performance of a development agreement dated 10 August 2003, entered in...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Admitted Writ Petition Challenging Cooperative Appellate Court's Order in Redevelopment Dispute. Interim Relief Granted for Possession of Flats in Ready Building Despite Opposition from Some Members.

The writ petition was filed by a cooperative housing society ('Godi Kamgar Griha Sanstha Ltd.') and its developer ('Bharat Infrastructure & Engineerin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Hawking Activities on Footpaths in Nariman Point and Churchgate Areas. Court Holds That Hawking Is a Fundamental Right Under Article 19(1)(g) Subject to Reasonable Restrictions, and That Municipal Authorities Have Discretion to Designate Hawking Zones.

The petitioners, a group of residents and welfare associations from Nariman Point and Churchgate areas in Mumbai, filed a Public Interest Litigation (...