Search Results for "recovery doubtful"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Compulsory Retirement Case Based on Declining ...
Supreme Court Disposes Appeal by Consent Appointing Arbitrator in MSME Dispute, ...

Search Results for "recovery doubtful"

1136 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1136 result(s)

High Court

Gujarat High Court Upholds Seizure of Industrial Oil by DRI Under Section 110 of Customs Act, 1962 — DRI Has Power to Seize Goods Even After Clearance for Home Consumption. The court held that the power of seizure under Section 110 is independent of assessment and can be exercised by DRI officers as proper officers.

9 Mar 2026

The judgment concerns a batch of writ petitions filed by importers of industrial oil challenging the seizure of their goods by the Directorate of Reve...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Dacoity Case Due to Unreliable Dock Identification and Lack of Corroborative Evidence. Conviction under Section 395 read with Section 397 IPC and Section 25 Arms Act set aside as sole eyewitness's testimony was doubtful and recovery of weapon was not linked to crime.

20 Feb 2025

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal of Vinod @ Nasmulla against his conviction under Section 395 read with Section 397 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Based on Circumstantial Evidence — Chain of Circumstances Incomplete and Section 106 Evidence Act Not Invocable Without Foundational Facts. Conviction under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to establish complete chain of circumstances and recoveries under Section 27 Evidence Act were inadmissible.

29 Jul 2024

The appellants, Adina (A1) and Ankush (A2), were convicted by the Sessions Judge, Yavatmal, for the murder of Subhash Rathod under Section 302 read wi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Life Imprisonment for Four Accused in Murder Case Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Last Seen Theory. Conviction under Sections 302, 326, 324 read with Section 34 IPC confirmed as prosecution proved chain of circumstances leading to the murder of the deceased.

6 Dec 2016

The case involves four appellants who were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Pune, for the murder of one person and causing injuries to othe...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Decides Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging Forest Development Tax Notification

3 Dec 2015

...

High Court

KAHC010479002008_1

3 Dec 2015

The High Court of Karnataka, Bengaluru, heard a consolidated batch of writ petitions filed by various entities including National Mineral Development ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Batch of Petitions Challenging Forest Development Tax Notification on Mining Leases; Examines Legislative Competence under Karnataka Forest Act and Forest (Conservation) Act.

3 Dec 2015

A batch of writ petitions was filed before the High Court of Karnataka challenging the validity of Notification No. FEE/23/2007-08 dated 16.08.2008 is...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Batch of Writ Petitions Concerning Forest Development Tax on Mining Leases Under Karnataka Forest Act, 1963; Constitutional Validity of Section 98A and Notification Examined. The petitioners contended that the notification dated 16.08.2008 and demand of forest development tax from holders of mining leases in forest areas were repugnant to the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 and ultra vires the State's legislative competence.

3 Dec 2015

A batch of writ petitions was filed before the High Court of Karnataka under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India by various entities inc...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Considers Challenge to Forest Notification as Ultra Vires the Constitution and Forest Laws — Mining Companies Allege Notification Violates Article 246 and Entry 54 of Union List, Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 and Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980

3 Dec 2015

The matter involved multiple writ petitions filed before the High Court of Karnataka by several mining corporations and mineral industries, including ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging Notification Dated 16.08.2008 Imposing Forest Development Tax. Validity of Notification Questioned on Grounds of Legislative Competence and Consistency with Central Forest Laws.

3 Dec 2015

...

19 20 21 22 23

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)