Search Results for "patent illegality"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "patent illegality"

1383 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1383 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Arbitral Award in Lease Dispute — Lessee's Appeal Dismissed for Lack of Patent Illegality. The court held that the arbitral tribunal's interpretation of the lease agreement and findings on breach of contract were plausible and not perverse, thus not warranting interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996.

21 Nov 2025

The appellant, Godolphine India Private Limited (formerly Darvesh Industries India Pvt Ltd), filed a commercial appeal under Section 37(1)(c) of the A...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 34 Petition Against Arbitral Award in Investment Dispute. Court upholds award of damages for breach of investment agreement, finding no patent illegality or perversity in arbitrator's findings.

18 Jul 2018

The case involves a challenge under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to an arbitral award dated 15th June 2017. The petitioner...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Award in Construction Dispute — No Patent Illegality Found. Section 37(1)(c) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Court upholds award of ₹3,52,50,404/- for unpaid work, rejecting challenge on grounds of erroneous interpretation of contract and evidence.

18 Jun 2026

The National Centre for Biological Sciences (NCBS) filed a commercial appeal under Section 37(1)(c) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, cha...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals Against Arbitral Awards in HPCL LPG Cylinder Supply Disputes — No Patent Illegality Found in Arbitrator's Interpretation of Contractual Terms. The court upheld the Single Judge's dismissal of objections under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, as the arbitrator's view was plausible and not patently illegal.

16 Mar 2019

The judgment involves a batch of appeals filed under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging orders passed by a Single J...

High Court

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Award in Stock Broker Dispute Due to Patent Illegality and Violation of Natural Justice. The court held that the arbitral tribunal erroneously shifted the burden of proof and failed to follow principles of natural justice, rendering the award liable to be set aside under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

31 Aug 2012

The case involves a challenge under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, to an arbitral award passed by a tribunal constituted un...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Transfer of Patent Suit to High Court Under Section 104 of Patents Act, 1970 — Counterclaim for Revocation Mandates Transfer. The court held that upon filing a counterclaim for revocation of a patent, the suit must be transferred to the High Court, and the trial court cannot insist on payment of court fees before taking the counterclaim on record.

6 Jun 2011

The applicant, SERGI Transformers Explosion Prevention Technologies Private Limited, challenged the orders of the learned District Judge, Thane dated ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Arbitral Award in Stock Broker Dispute Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Court Upholds Award as Not Suffering from Patent Illegality or Being Against Public Policy, Refusing to Reappreciate Evidence.

31 Aug 2012

The petitioner, Angel Capital & Debt Market Limited, a stock broker, challenged an arbitral award dated 16 May 2009 under Section 34 of the Arbitratio...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Sets Aside Commercial Court Order and Restores Arbitral Award in Service Agreement Dispute Over Witness Competence Issue. Commercial Court Erred in Finding Patent Illegality Based on Inadmissibility of Authorized Representative's Evidence Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, as Witness Competence Relates to Evidence Appreciation, Not Fundamental Legal Error.

10 Feb 2026

The dispute originated from a Master Service Agreement dated 11.04.2019  where Appellant agreed to provide temporary delivery executives to Swigg...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Bank of India's Petition Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act — Sets Aside Arbitral Award for Patent Illegality and Violation of Natural Justice. The Court held that the arbitrator's award of interest on pre-reference period without contractual basis and failure to consider bank's counterclaim amounted to patent illegality and denial of opportunity.

3 Nov 2025

The case involves a petition filed by Bank of India under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral award pass...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition to Set Aside Arbitral Award in Commercial Dispute. Court upholds award under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, finding no patent illegality or perversity in the arbitrator's findings.

7 Feb 2024

The petitioner, Rajuram Sawaji Purohit, filed an Arbitration Petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking to set a...

19 20 21 22 23

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)