Search Results for "open delivery"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "open delivery"

1765 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1765 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds High Court Decision Quashing Labour Cess Demand Under Building and Other Construction Workers' Welfare Cess Act, 1996. The Court held that the cess demand was invalid as the contract work did not constitute 'building or other construction work' under Section 2(1)(d) of the Building and Other Construction Workers (Regulation of Employment and Conditions of Service) Act, 1996, and the levy under Sections 3(1) and (2) of the Cess Act was not applicable.

12 May 2021

The Supreme Court of India, in a civil appellate jurisdiction, addressed a special leave petition under Article 136 of the Constitution of India. The ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Election Petition Challenging Municipal Election Result Due to Minor Name Discrepancy. Variation in candidate's name between electoral roll and nomination form does not constitute corrupt practice under Section 33 of Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888.

14 Oct 2016

The petitioner, Ansari Sana Masood, filed a writ petition challenging the judgment and order of the Small Cause Court, Mumbai, which dismissed her ele...

High Court

Bombay High Court Holds Letters Patent Appeal Maintainable Against Order in PIL and Validates Judgment Pronouncement by Single Judge After Other Judge Ceases to Hold Office. The court ruled that an order refusing to recall an earlier order in a Public Interest Litigation is a 'judgment' under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent, and a judgment prepared and signed by both judges of a Division Bench can be pronounced by one judge after the other demits office.

28 Feb 2006

The case arose from a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by the appellant concerning environmental issues in Lonavala. A Division Bench of the Bom...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Property Dispute — No Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act as Award Not Found to be Patently Illegal or Contrary to Public Policy. The Court Held That the Arbitral Tribunal's Interpretation of the Development Agreement Was Plausible and Did Not Warrant Setting Aside.

6 Apr 2026

The judgment pertains to a petition filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral award dated 30th Sep...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Hears Civil Appeals Concerning Applicability of Interest on Delayed Payments Act to Prior Contracts. The appeals arise from a common question of law regarding the retrospective application of the Interest on Delayed Payment to Small Scale and Ancillary Industrial Undertakings Act, 1993.

1 Aug 2026

The appeals before the Supreme Court arose from a common question of law regarding the applicability of the Interest on Delayed Payment to Small Scale...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Ruling on Karnataka EMTA Coal Mines Limited: A Complex Case Involving Coal Block Allocation and Legal Interpretations. A detailed examination of the legal challenges surrounding the joint venture agreements, audit reports, and allegations of criminal conspiracy in the coal mining sector.

23 Aug 2024

The Supreme Court of India addressed the appeals filed by M/s. Karnataka EMTA Coal Mines Limited and its Managing Director, challenging the charges fr...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Holds Police Cannot Seize Immovable Property Under Section 102 CrPC. The expression 'any property' in Section 102(1) CrPC means only movable property, and immovable property cannot be seized by police during investigation.

9 Aug 2019

The Supreme Court in this judgment resolved a long-standing conflict of opinion in the Bombay High Court regarding the interpretation of Section 102 o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Cotton Supply Dispute — Arbitrator's Findings on Breach of Contract and Damages Upheld Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The court held that the arbitrator's decision was based on evidence and within the contract terms, and no interference was warranted.

21 Jan 2014

The petitioner, M/s. BhavaniCotex, a proprietary firm engaged in the cotton business, challenged an arbitral award under Section 34 of the Arbitration...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Considers Quashing of Criminal Proceedings for Offences of Forgery and Cheating in Property Dispute; Private Complaint Alleged to Mirror Civil Suit for Possession

25 Nov 2025

The High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench, dealt with a criminal petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) s...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Life Conviction for Rape of Minor Under POCSO Act — Victim's Testimony Found Credible Despite Lack of Medical Evidence of Penetration. The court held that the sole testimony of the victim is sufficient to prove penetrative sexual assault under Section 4 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012, and absence of medical evidence does not discredit the prosecution.

24 Feb 2022

The appellant, Ramesh Tukaram Vavekar, was convicted by the Special Judge, Greater Bombay, in POCSO Special Case No.8 of 2016 for the offence punishab...

19 20 21 22 23

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)