Search Results for "mesne profits"

544 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 544 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Daughter's Right to Coparcenary Share Under Amended Section 6 of Hindu Succession Act Despite Father's Death Before 1956 Act. Daughter Granted 1/4th Share in Suit Property as Amendment is Retrospective and Confers Coparcenary Rights from Birth.

The case involves a second appeal before the Bombay High Court challenging the judgments of the trial court and the first appellate court in a partiti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals Against Remand Order in Suit for Possession and Mesne Profits — District Judge Exceeded Revisional Jurisdiction by Suo Motu Raising Valuation Issue Without Pleading or Prejudice.

The appellants, as plaintiffs, filed suits before the Civil Judge Junior Division, Nashik, seeking possession of suit property and compensation/mesne ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit — Upholds Concurrent Findings on Title and Adverse Possession. Court holds that dismissal of restitution application under Section 144(1) CPC does not bar a fresh suit for possession based on independent title.

The case involves a property dispute over a house and land at Survey No. 123, Block No. 276, village Atyal, taluka Gadhinglaj. The respondents (origin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal in Trust Property Ejectment Suit — Plaint Not Filed by Authorized Person. Suit for ejectment and mesne profits dismissed as the person filing the suit on behalf of the Trust was not duly authorized under the Trust Deed.

The appellant, Sri Shivabalayogi Maharaja Trust, filed a Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the judgm...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Possession Suit Based on Title — Concurrent Findings Set Aside for Ignoring Compromise Decree and Mutation Entries. The court held that failure to consider crucial evidence renders findings perverse and warrants remand under Section 100 CPC.

The present second appeal arises from a suit for possession based on title filed by the original plaintiff (respondent No. 1) against the original def...