Bombay High Court Hears Group of Writ Petitions for Quashing of Communication and Remand. Petitions Related to Plot Numbers in Survey No. 198 A/2, Village Kargaon, and Rule Made Returnable Forthwith.
1 Aug 2017...
Search Results for "maharashtra revenue tribunal"
1302 result(s) found
Found 1302 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows CENVAT Credit on Mobile Towers and Prefabricated Buildings for Mobile Service Providers — Interprets 'Capital Goods' and 'Inputs' Under CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. Mobile towers and PFBs are essential for providing telecom services and qualify as capital goods or inputs under the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004.
22 Nov 2024The Supreme Court of India adjudicated a batch of appeals concerning the eligibility of mobile service providers (MSPs) to claim CENVAT credit on exci...
- 380
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Metro Fare Hike; Judicial Review Not Permitted Over Specialist Committee's Decision Under Metro Act. Fare Fixation Committee's Determination Based on Section 34 Prevails Over Contractual Fare Stipulations, Limited to Checking Arbitrariness or Perversity.
4 Dec 2017The writ petition challenged the Fare Fixation Committee's decision to increase Mumbai Metro fares from Rs.9-13 to Rs.10-110 from January 2015. The pe...
- 61
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Validity of Section 29A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, Disqualifying Related Parties of Corporate Debtors from Submitting Resolution Plans. The Court holds that the disqualification under Section 29A(c) applies to persons acting jointly or in concert with a disqualified person, and that the provision is not retrospective in operation.
3 Oct 2024The Supreme Court of India delivered a landmark judgment on the interpretation and validity of Section 29A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016...
- 475
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Wakf Tribunal Order Upholding Plaintiff's Title Over Wakf Property. The court held that the Wakf Tribunal had jurisdiction to decide the suit and that the plaintiff's suit was not barred by limitation.
14 Feb 2024The case involves a dispute over Survey Gut No.66 of village Harsool, Aurangabad. The plaintiff, Pratapsingh s/o Nursing Kakarwal, filed a suit before...
- 41
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Tenant's Appeal in Bombay Tenancy Act Case — Deemed Purchase on Tillers' Day Upheld Despite Landlord's Minority. Landlord's Application for Possession Under Section 31 Having Been Rejected, Tenant Is Deemed Purchaser Under Section 32 Read with Section 29 of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948.
12 Feb 2019The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by the tenant, Bayaji Sambhu Mali @ Borate (through LRs), against the judgment of the High Court which had...
- 577
High Court
Bombay High Court Examines Jurisdiction of Customs Settlement Commission Under Sections 127A and 127B of the Customs Act, 1962 in Ten Writ Petitions. Whether Settlement Commission’s Authority Extends Beyond Short Levy Due to Misclassification to Cases Involving Fraud Is the Central Question.
21 Jul 2005The High Court of Judicature at Bombay heard ten writ petitions together, all involving a common legal question concerning the jurisdiction of the Set...
- 14
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Exemption for HDPE Cloth as Man-Made Fabric in Sales Tax Reference. HDPE cloth manufactured from HDPE yarn using looms is exempt from sales tax under the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959, as it falls within the description of 'cloth' in the First Schedule to the Additional Duties of Excise (Goods of Special Importance) Act, 1958.
5 Jun 2017The case involves a sales tax reference under Section 61(1) of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959, made by the Maharashtra Sales Tax Tribunal at the insta...
- 46
High Court
High Court of Bombay Dismisses Arbitration Petition in Interest on Security Deposit Dispute. Contractual Bar on Interest and Non-Applicability of Section 31(7)(a) Arbitration Act Renders Claim Unsustainable; Arbitrator’s Finding on Evidence Upheld.
11 Aug 2014The dispute arose from an agreement dated 30 December 1996 between the petitioner, M/s. Mascon Multiservices & Consultants Pvt. Ltd., and the responde...
- 37
High Court
High Court of Judicature at Bombay Refers Question of Law on Allowability of Expenditure under Section 40(a)(i) and Section 172 of Income Tax Act to Larger Bench. Disagreement with earlier Division Bench decision in CIT v. Orient (Goa) Pvt. Ltd. leads to referral on whether payer's non-resident status required for invoking proviso to Section 172.
5 Feb 2016Background: The case concerns income tax appeals filed by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against the order of the Income ...
- 12
