Search Results for "land title dispute"

3503 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3503 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Refers Writ Petition to Larger Bench Due to Conflict on MRTP Act Reservation Lapsing. Dispute Involves Whether Notice Under Section 127 Served Before Plan Revision Lapses Upon Finalisation of Revised Development Plan Under Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.

The judgment pertains to a writ petition filed by an agriculturist challenging the reservation of his land for a primary school under the Maharashtra ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay, Nagpur Bench, Hears Two Writ Petitions Regarding Regularisation of Gunthewari Layout Under Maharashtra Gunthewari Developments Act. Petitioners Seek Quashing of Order Dated 20.10.2005 Passed by Nagpur Improvement Trust.

Two writ petitions were filed before the High Court of Bombay, Nagpur Bench, challenging an order dated 20.10.2005 passed by the Chairman, Nagpur Impr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Compensation Enhancement for Acquired Land in Malad. Reference Under Section 18 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Seeks Higher Compensation Than Awarded by SLAO.

These proceedings arose from the acquisition of land under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The acquired property comprised land bearing Survey No. 91 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Plaintiff's Suit for Declaration and Possession in Property Identity Dispute. Plaintiff Established Use of Name Pushpa/Pushpalata Interchangeably and Held to Be True Owner of Flat Under Cooperative Society Share Certificate.

This suit involved a dispute between two sisters-in-law over the ownership of a residential flat in Mumbai. The plaintiff, Pushpalata Sohanlal Sharma,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Execution Proceedings — Possessory Title Not Required for Restoration Under Order XXI Rules 98-100 CPC. High Court erred in ordering restoration of possession without determining whether respondent had any right to possession under Order XXI Rules 98-100 CPC.

The Supreme Court considered an appeal against the judgment of the Calcutta High Court which had allowed the appeal of the respondent (Lt. Col. Nahar ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Property Dispute — Reverses Appellate Court's Perverse Findings. The Court held that the Appellate Court failed to consider the registered sale deed and revenue entries, leading to a perverse finding that warranted interference under Section 100 CPC.

The original plaintiff, Parmanand Gopalrao Kesari (since deceased, represented by legal representatives), filed a suit for declaration of ownership an...