Search Results for "inconsistent testimony"

1703 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1703 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Upholds Conviction in POCSO Act Case -- Appellant's Challenge to Child Sexual Assault Verdict Fails Due to Reliable Victim Testimony and Corroborative Evidence

The Appellant was convicted by the Trial Court for offences under Section 376(2)(i), 506 of the Indian Penal Code 1860 (IPC) and Sections 6 and 10 of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Sole Eyewitness Testimony. Conviction under Sections 302, 307, 324, 504, 506 read with 34 IPC set aside as the sole eyewitness's evidence was inconsistent and lacked corroboration.

The appellants, original accused Nos. 1 to 4, were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Sangamner, for the murder of Santu Jayram Ranmale and o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Unreliable Testimony of Mentally Ill Victim and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 342 and 376 IPC set aside as sole testimony of schizophrenia patient was inconsistent and unsupported by medical or other evidence.

The appellant, Nandlal Zagadu Yadav, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Mumbai in Sessions Case No.77/2008 for offences under Sec...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 8, 10, 12 of POCSO Act and Section 506 IPC set aside as victim's evidence was unreliable and medical evidence did not support sexual assault.

The appellant, Pravin Narayan Khole, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Pusad in Special (Child) Case No.9/2014 for offences under Sectio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Attempt to Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence. Conviction under Section 307 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The case involves two criminal appeals filed by original accused persons, Raju @ Pintya Hivrale and Mahendra @ Mandya Telgande, against a common judgm...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376(1) IPC and Section 4 POCSO Act Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Ajaykumar s/o Sambhunath Naik, was convicted by the Special Court, Chandrapur under Section 376(1) of the Indian Penal Code and Section...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 377 IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of POCSO Act set aside as testimonies of child victims were contradictory and unsupported by medical evidence.

The appellant, Navin Dhaniram Baraiye, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Nagpur in Special POCSO Case No. 218/2016 for offences under Se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal in Dowry Death Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Cruelty and Dowry Demand. State's appeal fails as prosecution could not establish that deceased was subjected to cruelty or harassment for dowry soon before her death under Section 304-B IPC.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of five accused persons (respondents) by the Additional Sessions Judge, Udgir, in Sessions Cas...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Attempt to Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Doubtful Prosecution Case. Allegation of Pushing Victim from Running Train Fails as Medical Evidence and Witness Testimony Contradict Prosecution Version.

The appellants, Kanchan Deokisanjee Panpalia and Tara Harishkumar Panpalia, were convicted by the 4th Additional Sessions Judge, Akola, for offences u...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Proof of Demand. Conviction under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to establish demand and acceptance of bribe beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Dattatraya Rajaram Thaokar, a retired government servant, was convicted by the Special Judge, Nagpur in Special Case No. 25/1991 for of...