KAHC030119362010_1
22 Dec 2020The text provided is a compilation of appeal numbers, parties, and advocates in a batch of motor accident claim appeals before the High Court of Karna...
Search Results for "enhancement notice"
1605 result(s) found
Found 1605 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal and Allows Claimant's Appeal in Motor Accident Case — Negligence of Bus Driver Established, Contributory Negligence Not Proven. Claimant Abdul awarded enhanced compensation of Rs. 1,50,000 with interest at 6% per annum from the date of petition till deposit.
27 May 2022The case involves two appeals arising from a motor accident claim. The appellant in MFA No. 103807/2016 is the New India Assurance Company Limited, wh...
- 57
High Court
High Court of Gujarat Enhances Compensation in Motor Accident Claim Case — Applies Multiplier of 18 and Adds Future Prospects for Self-Employed Deceased. Claimants awarded Rs. 8,56,800/- with interest at 7.5% per annum under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.
30 Mar 2026The present appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, was filed by the original claimants, being the legal heirs of the deceased Shrav...
- 174
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Case Upholding Ancestry-Based Classification. The Court Affirms That Distinction Between 'Pushtaini' and 'Gair-Pushtaini' Landholders for Compensation Under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 and Related Rules Has a Reasonable Nexus with Rehabilitation Objectives.
20 Feb 2023The appeals arose from a judgment and order dated 30 March 2018 by a Full Bench of the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, which upheld a classific...
- 312
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Enhances Compensation in Motor Accident Claims for Death of Two Persons in Tractor-Lorry Collision. The court applied the multiplier method with future prospects and upheld the finding of contributory negligence.
22 Sep 2015The judgment arises from three appeals filed under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the common judgment and award dated 03.04.2...
- 96
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal for Enhanced Compensation in Motor Accident Claim — Applies Pranay Sethi Principles for Future Prospects and Multiplier. Deceased Agricultural Labourer's Dependents Granted Rs.6,84,000 with 6% Interest.
21 Sep 2023The appellants, being the wife, father, and two minor sons of the deceased Madhu Kondiba Gavali, filed a claim application under Section 166 of the Mo...
- 76
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Acquiring Body's Writ Petition Challenging Section 28-A Award as Not Maintainable Due to Alternative Remedy. Acquiring Body Cannot Seek Reference Under Section 28-A(3) of Land Acquisition Act, 1894, as It Is Not a 'Person Interested' and Is Barred by Section 50(2).
18 Sep 2024The Bombay High Court dealt with three writ petitions filed by the Maharashtra Krishna Valley Development Corporation Limited, the acquiring body for ...
- 376
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Enhances Compensation for Death of Agricultural Worker in Motor Accident Claim. Notional income reassessed at Rs.6,000 per month and multiplier applied as per Sarla Verma, resulting in enhanced award of Rs.9,34,000.
3 Jun 2019This appeal arises from a judgment and award dated 5.5.2010 passed by the Principal Civil Judge (Sr. Dvn), CJM, Tumkur in MVC No.867/2008, whereby the...
- 113
Supreme Court
"Supreme Court of India Resolves Complexities in Taxation of Mineral Rights" "Judgment Clarifies Legislative Powers and the Nature of Royalty in Mining Sector"
25 Jul 2024The Supreme Court of India addressed a significant dispute regarding the distribution of legislative powers between the Union and the States, specific...
- 508
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Civil Court Decree in Land Acquisition Compensation Dispute — Petitioner Failed to Establish Entitlement to Higher Compensation Under Section 28A of Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The court held that the petitioner, having sought reference under Section 18, was not entitled to re-determination under Section 28A, and the issue was barred by res judicata.
20 Aug 2025The petitioner, the Defense Estate Officer, filed a writ petition challenging the judgment and decree dated 30.09.2024 passed by the Senior Civil Judg...
- 65
